Search for: "IP Holdings, Inc." Results 1081 - 1100 of 1,446
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Nov 2010, 7:06 am by Susan Brenner
In making this argument, Shields was relying on the Supreme Court’s holding in Franks v. [read post]
13 Oct 2010, 12:00 pm by Stefanie Levine
Lansa, Inc.[3]   As such, some courts have allowed the use of settlement agreements as evidence of a reasonable royalty. [read post]
12 Oct 2010, 8:56 pm by Kelly
General Media goof up over India-EU ‘settlement’ (Spicy IP) (Spicy IP) (Generic Pharmaceuticals and IP) Burdened with brackets, biodiversity ABS protocol needs political will to survive (IP Watch) Brazil: Deposit of microorganism for patents applications (IP tango) India: Student groups ask for reconsideration of TRIPS-plus provisions of EU-India FTA (Spicy IP) India: DIPP receives diverse replies to its compulsory licensing policy… [read post]
27 Sep 2010, 9:57 am by Phil
Via Peter Zura, we learn this week about Lemley's newest study, performed together with Joshua Walker, a former Stanford colleague of Lemley's who heads up IP data-gathering firm Lex Machina, Inc., and John Allison, a business professor at the University of Texas at Austin. [read post]
22 Sep 2010, 5:02 am
We therefore hold that for a website ... to be ‘intercepted’ in violation of the Wiretap Act, it must be acquired during transmission, not while it is in electronic storage. [read post]
19 Sep 2010, 10:39 pm by Kelly
Biolitec, Inc (Gray on Claims) (Patently-O) CAFC: Successor company holds patents assigned to predecessor company (even if assigned after predecessor dissolved): Tri-Star Electronics Int’l. v. [read post]
14 Sep 2010, 1:13 pm by David Lat
When he left Mayer Brown, he had a book of $20 million to $30 million — and today the number is even larger:With clients including Celanese Chemicals Inc., Fortress Investment Group, MBIA Inc. and Fairfax Financial Holdings Limited, Mr. [read post]
9 Sep 2010, 10:40 pm by Kelly
Hulu LLC (271 Patent Blog) District Court C D California: Proof that accused device ‘could be modified to infringe’ is insufficient to support finding of infringement: Phoenix Solutions, Inc. v. [read post]