Search for: "In Matter of Stewart"
Results 1081 - 1100
of 2,329
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Apr 2015, 10:37 am
Stewart Baker posted the newest episode of the Steptoe Cyberlaw Podcast (Episode #62), which features an interview with Dmitri Alperovitch, co-founder and CTO of CrowdStrike Inc. [read post]
14 Apr 2015, 5:31 pm
– Cincinnati lawyer Sara Simroll Rorer of Taft on the firm’s blog, Privacy and Security Insight More than Just a Fable – Why the “Cat’s Paw” Matters for Employers – Philadelphia lawyer Ivo Becica of Obermayer on the firm’s blog, HR Legalist Legal Issues in Cause-Related Marketing – Jason J. [read post]
8 Apr 2015, 11:32 am
An Afghan soldier opened fire at a government compound in Jalalabad earlier today, killing one U.S. soldier and wounding at least two others, the Associated Press reports. [read post]
8 Apr 2015, 7:04 am
In the end, it doesn’t matter if the agency doing the bulk collection is the DEA, the FBI, or the NSA; and it doesn’t matter if the information collected is the content of communications or metadata—bulk collection of Americans’ records is unconstitutional. [read post]
5 Apr 2015, 9:05 pm
Arkansas passes first-in-nation law to protect photographers’ rights, including right to film public employees/officials [Dan Greenberg, The Arkansas Project] “Colorado, Texas and California Lawmakers Introduce Bills to Protect Rights of Citizens to Record Cops” [Carlos Miller, Photography Is Not A Crime] On the other hand: “Texas Bill Would Make It Illegal For You To Film A Cop Beating You” [Lowering the Bar, more (“if you tell me I can’t film you in… [read post]
3 Apr 2015, 5:33 am
Stewart v. [read post]
2 Apr 2015, 10:24 am
They left Malcolm Stewart, arguing for the government, also in support of the status quo, largely uninterrupted. [read post]
1 Apr 2015, 4:24 am
It’s still prohibited as a matter of policy – so feel free to pass the link to this post to all of your friends at no charge. [read post]
28 Mar 2015, 6:55 am
Stewart Baker brought us this week’s Steptoe Cyberlaw Podcast, which, in addition to its usual round up of cyber news and lawsuits, features an interview with Richard Bejtlich. [read post]
23 Mar 2015, 9:03 am
<> Mott Foundation: Lessons from 35 Years of Supporting Community Foundations - The Great Lakes Protection Fund, the Charles Stewart Mott Foundation and the Joyce Foundation have long histories of supporting community foundations. [read post]
19 Mar 2015, 4:05 am
But that is not the end of the matter. [read post]
13 Mar 2015, 6:54 am
R.C. 121.22(G)(1)(creates a personnel deliberations exception to the open meetings requirement and authorizes a public body to meet in executive session to consider matters relating to the employment of a public employee, unless the public employee requests a public hearing, in which case, an open session must be held.) [read post]
11 Mar 2015, 4:00 am
Professor Hamish Stewart, in his 1996 paper for the Conference, described a trend in law to increasing the scope of admissibility ofevidence and an increasing reliance on the decision-makers to assign appropriate weight, but he did not support legislating this task. [read post]
9 Mar 2015, 3:58 pm
We specialize in serious criminal matters, family law, and immigration. [read post]
5 Mar 2015, 11:11 am
If workers’ compensation applies, Stewart said, it doesn’t matter if the hospital system was negligent. [read post]
3 Mar 2015, 12:45 pm
According to Federal Rule 56, summary judgment is proper if "there is no genuine dispute as to any material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. [read post]
3 Mar 2015, 6:45 am
After a year in a detention center and despite your best efforts, she is denied asylum as a matter of course and is summarily deported. [read post]
3 Mar 2015, 2:00 am
Heidi Rai Stewart, an attorney who concentrates her practice in "estate planning, estate and trust administration, special needs planning, elder law and Orphan's Court matters," has an interesting article in the March-April issue of The Pennsylvania Lawyer. [read post]
2 Mar 2015, 5:08 pm
The Board notes that the Open Meetings Act was not intended to grant a public employee the right to a public hearing on matters relating to his/her employment unless such a right was provided by law. [read post]
2 Mar 2015, 8:50 am
Stewart, of the Department of Justice. [read post]
