Search for: "In the Matter of Amendments to Rules 1 and 10"
Results 1081 - 1100
of 5,430
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Nov 2016, 12:25 pm
(You can read Part-II here) [1] (1978) 2 SCC 213[2] SC to revisit Justice Krishna Iyer’s Landmark Judgment in Bangalore Water Supply case on Thursday, LiveLaw.in, Nov. 16, 2016, available at http://www.livelaw.in/sc-revisit-justice-krishna-iyers-landmark-judgment-bangalore-water-supply-case-thursday/[3] (2005) 5 SCC 1 [4] SC May Refer the 1978 Bangalore Water Supply Judgment for Reconsideration by a Nine-Judge Bench, LiveLaw.in, Nov. 17,… [read post]
25 Nov 2016, 7:11 pm
(You can read Part-II here) [1] (1978) 2 SCC 213[2] SC to revisit Justice Krishna Iyer’s Landmark Judgment in Bangalore Water Supply case on Thursday, LiveLaw.in, Nov. 16, 2016, available at http://www.livelaw.in/sc-revisit-justice-krishna-iyers-landmark-judgment-bangalore-water-supply-case-thursday/[3] (2005) 5 SCC 1 [4] SC May Refer the 1978 Bangalore Water Supply Judgment for Reconsideration by a Nine-Judge Bench, LiveLaw.in, Nov. 17,… [read post]
10 Jul 2018, 9:10 am
"[T]he net neutrality rule violates the First Amendment to the U.S. [read post]
8 Oct 2013, 5:01 pm
Both the patent proprietor and one of the opponents filed an appeal against the maintenance of the opposed patent in amended form. [read post]
29 Nov 2022, 9:06 am
That matters a lot because it deprives Canadians of the cohort of material that would have entered the public domain on January 1, 2023 from the creators who died in 1972. [read post]
13 Oct 2011, 7:16 am
However, this general rule does not apply when the procedural, so the rules above may well apply to proceedings pending as of September 1, 2011. [read post]
10 Feb 2024, 1:07 am
February 20, 2024. 10:30 AM – 7 PM ET (New York). [read post]
10 Jun 2019, 4:00 am
The Administrative Law Judge found, upon the hearing, that a preponderance of the evidence showed that the petitioner committed a category three act of neglect (see Social Services Law §§493[3][a][i]; [4][c]; 494[1][a]; 14 NYCRR 624.5[j][1][i]; 700.4-700.5). [read post]
24 Oct 2007, 2:59 pm
Thoughts on the cert briefing and the case to date: 1. [read post]
26 Jun 2018, 10:30 am
Indeed, at least on my preliminary first reading, Carpenter appears to be even more extraordinary and groundbreaking than the initial reports have suggested, for at least three reasons.1. [read post]
15 Oct 2021, 7:38 am
(2) Matters to be included. [read post]
28 Oct 2007, 4:00 pm
§ 634F-1 (emphasis added). [read post]
3 Mar 2010, 4:02 pm
Originally, an employee or dependent was required, among other things, to have experienced a loss of coverage as a result of an involuntary termination occurring between September 1, 2008 and December 31, 2009 to qualify for coverage under the COBRA premium subsidy rules as “assistance eligible individual for up to 9 months. [read post]
23 Apr 2020, 1:08 pm
(1) The trial court retained jurisdiction to amend a sentence until the time for notice of appeal expires; (2) Amendment of a drug trafficking sentence to include the maximum term that corresponds to the mandatory minimum sentence was a clerical correction that the trial court could make outside of the defendant’s presence. [read post]
9 Aug 2012, 10:43 am
Patent relative: only the top 10% get into the contest at all. [read post]
30 May 2014, 7:43 pm
A test’s SEM is a statistical fact, a reflection of the inherent imprecision of the test itself” (10). [read post]
2 Nov 2018, 5:22 am
The board issued a communication dated 4 July 2018 pursuant to Article 15(1) of the Rules of Procedure of the Boards of Appeal (RPBA) annexed to a summons to oral proceedings. [read post]
6 Nov 2017, 1:52 pm
All contempt proceedings brought pursuant to P.L.1991, c.261 (C.2C:25-17 et seq.) shall be subject to any rules or guidelines established by the Supreme Court to guarantee the prompt disposition of criminal matters. [read post]
1 Apr 2014, 9:52 pm
Therefore we find that he violated Rule 3.3(a)(1). [read post]
