Search for: "In the Matter of Amendments to Rules 1 and 10"
Results 1081 - 1100
of 5,486
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Jul 2018, 9:10 am
"[T]he net neutrality rule violates the First Amendment to the U.S. [read post]
2 Aug 2012, 2:16 pm
The court determined that while it would be unreasonable to require Sprint to compile a full list of class members over the 10-year class period because it would require 6-12 months of work and cost at least $1 million, Sprint’s records showed that Sprint could potentially identify subsets of customers who were members of the class. [read post]
25 Nov 2016, 12:25 pm
(You can read Part-II here) [1] (1978) 2 SCC 213[2] SC to revisit Justice Krishna Iyer’s Landmark Judgment in Bangalore Water Supply case on Thursday, LiveLaw.in, Nov. 16, 2016, available at http://www.livelaw.in/sc-revisit-justice-krishna-iyers-landmark-judgment-bangalore-water-supply-case-thursday/[3] (2005) 5 SCC 1 [4] SC May Refer the 1978 Bangalore Water Supply Judgment for Reconsideration by a Nine-Judge Bench, LiveLaw.in, Nov. 17,… [read post]
25 Nov 2016, 7:11 pm
(You can read Part-II here) [1] (1978) 2 SCC 213[2] SC to revisit Justice Krishna Iyer’s Landmark Judgment in Bangalore Water Supply case on Thursday, LiveLaw.in, Nov. 16, 2016, available at http://www.livelaw.in/sc-revisit-justice-krishna-iyers-landmark-judgment-bangalore-water-supply-case-thursday/[3] (2005) 5 SCC 1 [4] SC May Refer the 1978 Bangalore Water Supply Judgment for Reconsideration by a Nine-Judge Bench, LiveLaw.in, Nov. 17,… [read post]
30 Jun 2019, 4:07 pm
The Guardian had a piece “The Trump rule? [read post]
25 Jun 2018, 11:17 pm
The Opposition Division decided to maintain the patent in amended form according to an auxiliary request filed by the patent proprietor.IV. [read post]
8 Oct 2013, 5:01 pm
Both the patent proprietor and one of the opponents filed an appeal against the maintenance of the opposed patent in amended form. [read post]
13 Nov 2019, 7:40 am
Computer Packages, Inc., 694 F.3d 10, 21 (Fed. [read post]
26 Jun 2018, 10:30 am
Indeed, at least on my preliminary first reading, Carpenter appears to be even more extraordinary and groundbreaking than the initial reports have suggested, for at least three reasons.1. [read post]
26 Mar 2019, 8:09 am
Having been consulted, the part that he played and the influence which he exerted were matters for his political judgment. [read post]
17 Nov 2008, 6:39 pm
November 10 - 14, 2008. [read post]
20 Feb 2022, 10:47 pm
According to a 2010 study [n=1991], 1 in every 5 students has faced discrimination at school. [read post]
29 Nov 2022, 9:06 am
That matters a lot because it deprives Canadians of the cohort of material that would have entered the public domain on January 1, 2023 from the creators who died in 1972. [read post]
28 Oct 2007, 4:00 pm
§ 634F-1 (emphasis added). [read post]
9 Jun 2010, 5:14 am
” Perhaps some future court will distinguish Exxon from a suit against BP, but the opinion is awfully clear that a 1:1 rule is the law. [read post]
10 Jun 2019, 4:00 am
The Administrative Law Judge found, upon the hearing, that a preponderance of the evidence showed that the petitioner committed a category three act of neglect (see Social Services Law §§493[3][a][i]; [4][c]; 494[1][a]; 14 NYCRR 624.5[j][1][i]; 700.4-700.5). [read post]
30 Sep 2015, 9:19 am
¶10. [read post]
30 Sep 2015, 9:19 am
¶10. [read post]
1 Feb 2012, 5:01 pm
There were no major amendments to these rules during the revision of the EPC; R 152(11) corresponds to R 101(9) EPC 1973.[2.2] The “Decision of the President of the EPO dated 12 July 2007 on the filing of authorisations” (OJ EPO special edition 3/2007, 128, hereinafter referred to as “DecFilAuth”) was based on R 152(1). [read post]
2 Nov 2018, 5:22 am
The board issued a communication dated 4 July 2018 pursuant to Article 15(1) of the Rules of Procedure of the Boards of Appeal (RPBA) annexed to a summons to oral proceedings. [read post]
