Search for: "In the Matter of Parker" Results 1081 - 1100 of 1,579
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Jun 2008, 8:13 am
The amounts now include prejudgment interest to compensate for how long it took to resolve the matter. [read post]
29 Jan 2023, 10:15 pm by GWS Law
What the argument amounted to was no more than an invitation to this court to consider the matter afresh. [read post]
26 Mar 2016, 4:31 pm by Chris Castle
  Let me tell you what’s really strange:  Sean Parker is a billionaire. [read post]
15 May 2023, 10:57 am by Amy Howe
Sennett’s husband died by suicide shortly after her death; Parker was executed in 2010 for his role in her murder. [read post]
6 Jun 2014, 5:49 am by Jim Sedor
The report said Kamins violated the judicial code of ethics by advising Hynes on his campaign, offering legal advice, and discussing matters the district attorney’s office was actively prosecuting. [read post]
8 Dec 2016, 1:54 pm by Giles Peaker
On the other hand, a period measured in years may in some cases be appropriate: see, for example, Parker v Parker [2003] EWHC 1846 (Ch), where the Earl of Macclesfield was held entitled to two years to leave the ancestral home, Shirburn Castle, which he had been occupying as a licensee for some ten years. [read post]
24 Oct 2007, 2:59 pm
  You could already begin to see the influence of that audience when the case (then captioned Parker v. [read post]
11 Apr 2018, 9:00 pm by Dan Flynn
” He said the question was only “whether or not the matter occurred. [read post]
24 Mar 2009, 2:47 pm
  According to Christopher Parker, one of the employees at that meeting, Junior said he thought that Regalia acted as if he owned the museum. [read post]
15 Dec 2011, 7:47 am by Russ Bensing
  In fact, Parker wound up being compensated at the rate of $18.50 an hour for his trial time. [read post]
1 Jun 2011, 7:15 pm by Michelle Lindo McCluer
  Ignoring the constitutional issue for a moment, Judge Tozzi asked whether it mattered that Congress passed the amended Art 2 provision after it enacted MEJA (assuming MEJA applied to Ali). [read post]
6 Nov 2018, 1:49 pm by Howard Knopf
The Parker Commission recommended this in 1935, and the government of day approved it for reasons that are essentially just as valid today as they were more than 80 years ago.How can it help small businesses to potentially have to negotiate separately with SOCAN and RE:SOUND who have millions a year to spend on legal fees and other costs associated with collective administration and pushing revenues up? [read post]