Search for: "Jack Goldsmith" Results 1081 - 1100 of 1,699
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Nov 2014, 10:19 am by Benjamin Bissell
ICYMI: Yesterday, On Lawfare Jack Goldsmith analyzed Senator Paul’s proposed declaration of war against the Islamic State. [read post]
14 Nov 2014, 3:43 am
Jack Goldsmith, Martin Lederman and several others have suggested that the Supreme Court could avoid difficult constitutional decisions about the separation of powers in foreign relations in Zivotofsky v. [read post]
13 Nov 2014, 11:25 am by Cody Poplin
Breaking news flooding onto our Twitter streams today: the Islamic State of Iraq and Syria has released a new audio recording of Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi, accompanied by English translation of his remarks. [read post]
13 Nov 2014, 7:00 am
(The clause is mentioned very briefly by Jack Goldsmith here; it still leaves open the question of a different congressional power, like commerce, discussed by Eugene Kontorovich.) [read post]
12 Nov 2014, 7:07 am by Wells Bennett
As noted earlier, Senator Tim Kaine (D-Va) will give remarks on ISIS and congressional authorization; afterwards, Wilson Center Director and former Representative Jane Harman, and Lawfare’s own Jack Goldsmith, will join with Senator Kaine for a moderated discussion. [read post]
10 Nov 2014, 7:08 am by Clara Spera
Our latest podcast features Jack Goldsmith at an event over at the Hoover Institution, addressing President Obama’s war powers legacy. [read post]
3 Nov 2014, 4:39 am by Amy Howe
  Commentary on the case comes from Akiva Shapiro in The Wall Street Journal (subscription required), Garrett Epps for The Atlantic, Eugene Kontorovich of The Volokh Conspiracy (parts one and two), Marty Lederman at Just Security, Jack Goldsmith at Lawfare, Michael Ramsey at The Originalism Blog, Gershom Gorenberg in The American Prospect, and Peter Spiro at Opinio Juris. [read post]
31 Oct 2014, 2:09 pm by Cody Poplin
ICYMI: Yesterday, on Lawfare Jack Goldsmith provides his view on “How the Supreme Court Should Resolve Zivotofsky. [read post]
31 Oct 2014, 4:31 am by Amy Howe
  In a post at Lawfare, Jack Goldsmith argues that the Court should rule “that Congress lacked power to enact this bald foreign policy legislation under Article I” of the Constitution, thereby avoiding “the super-hard problem of defining the contours of exclusive presidential power based on the vague and uncertain textual materials in Article II. [read post]
31 Oct 2014, 3:57 am
Marty Lederman joins into my discussion with Jack Goldsmith about the Art. [read post]
30 Oct 2014, 8:48 pm
"How the Supreme Court Should Resolve Zivotofsky": Jack Goldsmith has this post today at the "Lawfare" blog. [read post]
30 Oct 2014, 6:16 am
Jack Goldsmith argues today that Supreme Court should avoid the difficult questions of exclusive executive power in Zivotosfky v. [read post]
29 Oct 2014, 8:19 am by Benjamin Wittes
The legal background has been well canvassed by Curt Bradley, Jack Goldsmith, and Robert Reinstein. [read post]
27 Oct 2014, 10:46 am by Benjamin Bissell
While the US midterm elections are still a week away, democratic contests elsewhere in the world are ongoing or have just concluded. [read post]
4 Oct 2014, 7:34 pm
And today at the "Lawfare" blog, Jack Goldsmith has a post titled "Judge Kessler's Videotape Order and the Costs of Crying Wolf. [read post]
2 Oct 2014, 1:49 pm by Jennifer Williams
Not to brag or anything, but that’s more than Benjamin Wittes; more than Bobby Chesney; more than Jack Goldsmith; more than my boss, Daniel Byman. [read post]
19 Sep 2014, 10:16 am by Cody Poplin
In the New York Times, Charlie Savage, citing our own Jack Goldsmith, writes that Congress’s refusal to act on ISIS could create a precedent that grants the executive branch even greater war powers. [read post]
13 Sep 2014, 6:55 am by Benjamin Bissell
On Sunday, Matt Danzer tipped us off that the Department of Justice declassified two Office of Legal Counsel opinions by Jack Goldsmith from 2004. [read post]
12 Sep 2014, 8:05 am
My own critique of the president’s actions is almost an apologia for the White House compared tothe commentaries by famous liberal constitutional law scholar Bruce Ackerman, conservative Harvard professor Jack Goldsmith (a leading expert on national security law became famous when he repudiated the “torture memo” while serving in the Bush administration), war powers expert Lou Fisher, and Benjamin Wittes of the center-left Brookings Institution. [read post]