Search for: "John Doe et al"
Results 1081 - 1100
of 1,472
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Mar 2010, 2:09 pm
., Making Vehicles Safer, Am J Public Health. 2004 February; Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Department of Health Policy and Management) There is widespread agreement that these reductions can be credited in part to safer products, better regulation and increased public awareness. [read post]
15 Mar 2010, 9:42 am
., et al., 2010 WL 743834 (M.D. [read post]
13 Mar 2010, 3:11 pm
See AutoZone, Inc. et al v. [read post]
10 Mar 2010, 7:58 am
JOHN DOE, ET AL., App. [read post]
8 Mar 2010, 7:36 am
Nelson, et al. (09-530). [read post]
5 Mar 2010, 3:54 am
The piece by Mike Von Fremd, et al., naturally starts out with questions by John Walsh, never one to let proof of guilt precede condemnation, like "Why was this animal out on the streets? [read post]
3 Mar 2010, 7:33 pm
Just because the American people sometimes make choices that policymakers find distasteful, it does not mean that citizens don’t have good choices at their disposal. [read post]
3 Mar 2010, 2:44 pm
Upper Deck et al (CAFC 2009-1022) precedential The facts supposedly uncontested, the decision was a treated as a matter of law. [read post]
3 Mar 2010, 12:04 pm
Yousuf, et al. (08-1555) seemed to make a convincing case, thus leaving the Justices to work out a decision, unaided by much beyond their own perceptions, in coming weeks. [read post]
2 Mar 2010, 6:15 am
In a statement the set said: “One Essex Court does not ordinarily comment on its relationship with individual clients. [read post]
2 Mar 2010, 5:09 am
See: Sopinka, John, et al, The Law of Evidence in Canada, 2nd Edition, Buttersworth, 1999, “The Opinion of Experts”. 2. [read post]
2 Mar 2010, 2:16 am
The patriotism thing started by David Cameron has descended into a very ‘British farce’ with the Home Secretary weighing in with his comments about Lord Ashcroft’s un-patritotic behaviour only for Eric Pickles et al to lob in those great British patriots who support Labour – Lord Paul, Mittal et al. [read post]
1 Mar 2010, 7:18 pm
Yousuf, et al. (08-1555). [read post]
26 Feb 2010, 6:26 pm
The following essay was written for our Race and the Supreme Court program by John C. [read post]
25 Feb 2010, 1:17 pm
Chicago, et al. (08-1521). [read post]
22 Feb 2010, 9:00 pm
., et al., American Journal of Psychiatry (Dec. 2006), http://ajp.psychiatryonline.org/cgi/content/full/163/12/2134. [read post]
20 Feb 2010, 8:15 am
[In the Matter of the Adoption of John Doe, 2008 WL 5070056 (Fla. 16th Cir. [read post]
19 Feb 2010, 7:25 am
But Cheney et al. had the advantage of the brutish, simplistic conviction that their problem, and their only problem, was to protect the American people from its enemies. [read post]
17 Feb 2010, 3:51 am
Bayer Corp. et al., (S.D. [read post]
15 Feb 2010, 6:03 pm
Sure, Rudy Giuliani et al are saying things now that are inconsistent with what they said during the Bush years, but once the right advances the war-means-use-military-commissions-rather-than-civilian-courts-and-waterboarding-rather-than-Miranda-warnings meme, Holder's the-choice-between-security-and-our-values-is-a-false-choice response will inevitably be viewed as the other side of a political argument. [read post]
