Search for: "John Does, 1-2"
Results 1081 - 1100
of 10,082
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Aug 2022, 5:17 am
See, e.g., Doe v. [read post]
24 Aug 2022, 9:55 am
Noise and its discontents There are two main kinds of judgments in which noise can be problematic: (1) when we’re predicting things (what will happen) and (2) when we’re evaluating things (what’s good or not so good.) [read post]
24 Aug 2022, 5:01 am
[1] See Volokh, supra note 1, at 1366–68. [2] See, e.g., DePuy Synthes Prod., Inc. v. [read post]
23 Aug 2022, 7:13 am
Example #2: Sarah, Psychologist in Costa Rica Sarah is a California native working as a psychologist in Costa Rica. [read post]
23 Aug 2022, 5:01 am
District Judge John Sirica denied the motion, and the Haldeman court affirmed—by a 5-1 vote. [read post]
22 Aug 2022, 8:40 am
BP claims that Cook’s testimony is unreliable because 1) he did not verify Pettaway’s diagnoses; 2) follow the accepted methodology for analyzing epidemiology and evaluate the scientific literature. [read post]
21 Aug 2022, 5:58 am
Does it matter or not? [read post]
21 Aug 2022, 5:06 am
Under the statute, as amended in 1942, when the agent of a foreign principal disseminates any “political propaganda,” the agent must: (1) provide the Attorney General with a copy of the material and describe the extent of planned dissemination, (2) provide the recipient of the material with a disclosure statement, and (3) label the material with markings that identify the agent and the agent’s principal.[8] The 1950’s: Oh, We’ve Got Trouble! [read post]
19 Aug 2022, 12:20 pm
In which the Fifth Circuit determines that Sealed Appellee was not a John Doe. [read post]
19 Aug 2022, 6:59 am
§ 355(j)(2)(A)(vii)(IV). [read post]
19 Aug 2022, 6:06 am
The distinction between aiding and agreeing sometimes looks sharper on paper than it does in practice. [read post]
19 Aug 2022, 2:33 am
It does not require the bells to be removed. [read post]
18 Aug 2022, 5:43 am
On July 1, 2022, U.S. [read post]
18 Aug 2022, 3:21 am
Text Copyright John L. [read post]
17 Aug 2022, 8:38 am
The Supreme Court held that (1) establishing an injury sufficient for Article III standing requires a plaintiff asserting a statutory violation to demonstrate a “close historical or common-law analogue for their asserted injury,” and (2) that “[e]very class member must have Article III standing in order to recover individual damages. [read post]
17 Aug 2022, 8:30 am
1. [read post]
17 Aug 2022, 5:00 am
I hope it does pass. [read post]
17 Aug 2022, 3:15 am
Text Copyright John L. [read post]
16 Aug 2022, 11:01 am
Myth #1: As former president Nixon once said, “When the president does it that means that it is not illegal. [read post]
16 Aug 2022, 6:42 am
National Security Adviser John Bolton. [read post]
