Search for: "Johnson v. The State of Texas"
Results 1081 - 1100
of 1,251
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Jul 2009, 6:45 am
(Afro-IP) Spain Trade mark cancellation and damages: a matter of (bad) faith (Class 46) United Kingdom EWHC (Pat): No ruling on hypothetical issue: MMI Research Ltd v Cellxion Ltd (IPKat) EWHC (Pat): EP 258 valid in Netherlands but not UK: Novartis AG and Cibavision AG v Johnson & Johnson Medical Ltd & Ors (PatLit) EWHC: Trial judge says ‘Boileau’ to patent licence; appeal court agrees: Oxonica Energy Ltd… [read post]
11 Jul 2009, 8:38 am
ERS of Texas v. [read post]
5 Jul 2009, 10:30 pm
In Johnson [v. [read post]
5 Jul 2009, 10:30 pm
In Johnson [v. [read post]
5 Jul 2009, 3:31 pm
[pdf] View Electronic Briefs in Tex. 2009 No. 06-1071 STATE FARM LLOYDS v. [read post]
5 Jul 2009, 2:23 pm
After a reported five hours of deliberation, the jury in Centocor Inc v Abbott Laboratories awarded the Johnson & Johnson unit $1.67 billion for Abbott's willful infringement. [read post]
28 Jun 2009, 6:29 am
Madison and Brown v. [read post]
22 Jun 2009, 10:52 am
State of Kansas v. [read post]
6 Jun 2009, 2:21 pm
[pdf] View E-Briefs in THE STATE OF TEXAS v. [read post]
5 Jun 2009, 7:43 am
State of Texas, No. 07â€â [read post]
4 Jun 2009, 3:41 am
Furthermore, in Johnson v. [read post]
14 May 2009, 1:53 pm
" (Waller v. [read post]
2 May 2009, 10:12 am
May 15, 2009)(per curiam) (condemnation, uncompensable losses, lost revenue testimony should not have been admitted)THE STATE OF TEXAS v. [read post]
27 Apr 2009, 4:27 pm
Severance had not pursued just compensation in Texas state courts, and the court held her claim was not ripe under Williamson County Regional Planning Comm'n v. [read post]
25 Apr 2009, 3:21 am
Johnson signed into law the Voting Rights Act of 1965, on Aug. 6 of that year. [read post]
23 Apr 2009, 5:01 am
Moreover, Rabb pre-dated Marin v. [read post]
20 Apr 2009, 7:13 am
In Proctor & Gamble Co. v. [read post]
18 Apr 2009, 1:46 pm
OpinionsEntergy Gulf States, Inc. v. [read post]
16 Apr 2009, 12:42 pm
In Johnson v. [read post]
15 Apr 2009, 4:44 am
What we're doing here is the start, not the end, of relevant research.Also, if you think we didn't get your state right, please let us know. [read post]
