Search for: "KELLY v. STATE"
Results 1081 - 1100
of 2,340
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Mar 2019, 7:51 am
R. v Kelly, Wade, 2019 CanLII 18369 (NL PC) [33] Dishonesty comes in many forms, including with wilful blindness. [read post]
15 Mar 2017, 6:30 am
Most famously, all fifty states make 21 the legal drinking age because in the most important pre-Sebelius conditional funding case, South Dakota v. [read post]
20 Apr 2022, 7:09 am
Next up is Kelly v. [read post]
17 Oct 2024, 3:18 am
In his famous concurrence in Youngstown Sheet v. [read post]
10 Jun 2019, 4:00 am
Notably, the petitioner did not testify that she had directed any of her aides to specifically supervise the student at the time of the incident.Under these circumstances, substantial evidence supports the determination of the Justice Center that the petitioner committed category three neglect (see Matter of Williams v New York State Justice Ctr. for the Protection of People with Special Needs, 151 AD3d at 1356-1357; see also Matter of Kelly v New York… [read post]
4 Jun 2018, 6:10 pm
See United States v. [read post]
1 Oct 2007, 8:03 am
Kelly (06-11622) noted that they did not dissent from the Court's action. [read post]
12 Nov 2020, 11:45 am
For more information on the decision, please contact Kelly Becker, Kathryn Gonski, Trinity Morale, or Erin Bambrick. [read post]
12 Nov 2020, 11:45 am
For more information on the decision, please contact Kelly Becker, Kathryn Gonski, Trinity Morale, or Erin Bambrick. [read post]
2 Aug 2016, 9:43 am
Failinger Denying the Poor Access to Court: United States v. [read post]
27 Apr 2008, 12:35 am
In Nord v. [read post]
17 Oct 2010, 11:40 am
This is a judicial review which is something of a sequel to Kelly & Mehari v Birmingham CC (our report, bailii transcript), and as with that case, deals with apparent gatekeeping by Birmingham City Council. [read post]
17 Oct 2010, 11:40 am
This is a judicial review which is something of a sequel to Kelly & Mehari v Birmingham CC (our report, bailii transcript), and as with that case, deals with apparent gatekeeping by Birmingham City Council. [read post]
28 Jun 2019, 8:30 am
Kelly (1970). [read post]
10 Apr 2008, 3:42 pm
Kelly Issue: Whether 28 U.S.C 2254, the federal habeas provision governing claims adjudicated on the merits in state court, should be applied to claims based on evidence of ineffective assistance of counsel the state court refused to consider. [read post]
25 Nov 2016, 7:00 am
By Kelly McClure In Waldrop v. [read post]
24 Feb 2012, 5:52 am
Toole v. [read post]
30 Nov 2017, 9:15 am
While the English v. [read post]
11 Oct 2011, 3:57 am
Great Seats, Inc. v. [read post]
6 Apr 2011, 3:04 pm
Accordingly, the court concluded that prejudice must be presumed under United States v Cronic, 466 US 648; 104 S Ct 2039; 80 L Ed 2d 657 (1984). [read post]
