Search for: "Lee v. Lee" Results 1081 - 1100 of 7,964
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Sep 2008, 1:15 pm
The Indianapolis Star has a brief story today on yesterday's COA decision in the case of Kenneth Allen v. [read post]
11 Mar 2016, 10:43 am by Anthony McCain
Steve Brachmann: University Research Leads To Breakthroughs In 3d Printed Organs Andrew Williams: Cuozzo Speed v. [read post]
30 Oct 2018, 1:28 pm by Joseph Stacey
The F/V JUDA LEE was approximately 7 miles off the coast of Nome, Alaska when the incident occurred. [read post]
5 Mar 2019, 4:54 pm by Joseph Stacey
According to Captain Lee Boone, Chief of Coast Guard Investigations, “It just wasn’t one thing”. [read post]
22 Mar 2011, 11:21 am by WISCONSIN LAW JOURNAL STAFF
Civil Procedure Sanctions Where the plaintiffs’ attorney failed to file a timely appeal or file new suits in the district court after the case was dismissed without prejudice, failed to comply with court rules, and failed to be admitted to bar, a $5,000 sanction is imposed. [read post]
10 Oct 2018, 2:15 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
On appeal from: [2016] NICA 39 This appeal considered whether the appellants directly discriminated against a customer, the respondent, on the grounds of sexual orientation, contrary to the Equality Act (Sexual Orientation) Regulations (NI) 2006, and religious and political belief contrary to the Fair Employment and Treatment (NI) Order 1988, by refusing to make a cake decorated with the words ‘Support Gay Marriage’. [read post]
3 Mar 2020, 7:51 am by Daily Record Staff
Criminal Procedure — Joint defendants — Severance In this consolidated appeal, appellants, Daniel James, Cory Knight, and Antonio McClennon, challenge their convictions for first-degree and second-degree assault, armed carjacking, carjacking, conspiracy to commit armed carjacking, and use of handgun in the commission of a felony. [read post]
Failure to provide a conditionally discharged restricted patient with a full explanation of the decision to recall him into detention within 72 hours of the recall date will not render the detention unlawful, nor will it give rise to a claim for damages in common law or under section 8 of the Human Rights Act. [read post]