Search for: "Liability and Insurers for each Defendant" Results 1081 - 1100 of 3,435
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Jan 2022, 6:18 am by The Law Offices of John Day, P.C.
Plaintiff was in an accident while driving an HMA vehicle, and he filed a personal injury suit and gave HMA’s insurer, defendant Liberty Mutual, notice of a potential uninsured motorist claim. [read post]
15 Sep 2014, 3:31 pm by Cynthia Marcotte Stamer
“Today’s federal grant awards will enhance states’ ability to detect incidents of worker misclassification and protect the integrity of state unemployment insurance trust funds. [read post]
3 Aug 2021, 3:00 am by Robert Kreisman
Court of Appeals Affirms Duty to Defend Subcontractor for Employee Injured on Construction Job Illinois Appellate Court Finds That Insurer is Obligated to Defend for Vicarious Liability Even Though the Complaint Does Not Allege Chicago Federal District Court Finds Insurer Obligated to Indemnify for Work Injury   The post Illinois Supreme Court Decides Contribution Act Exception, Obligation of a Tortfeasor Who Is Not Uncollectible appeared first on… [read post]
31 Dec 2007, 10:10 pm
The trial court denied plaintiff's motion: “It ruled that the remedy each class member sought, i.e., voiding the rescission of their insurance policies, was of no benefit to each class member without a separate trial on the merits as to each plaintiff because each individual's case would turn on its own unique circumstances. [read post]
3 May 2010, 8:48 am by Dan Markel
  Suppose our insured defendant has incurred punitive damages liability. [read post]
23 Apr 2012, 12:18 pm
Florida law also requires that each car owner purchase at least $10,000 in Property Damage Liability or PD. [read post]
30 Jul 2012, 4:34 pm by S2KM Limited
Some common industry practices, at least during the 1985-1990 time period, could create problems for defendant/liability insurers. [read post]
4 Sep 2012, 1:34 am by Kevin LaCroix
  In a different case, on June 29, 2012, the Seventh Circuit, applying Illinois law, held that when the defendants in a lawsuit include both persons who are insureds under the defendant company’s D&O policy and persons are not insureds, the policy’s Insured vs. [read post]
3 Jan 2013, 12:28 am by Kevin LaCroix
  The jury found that the defendants had been negligent and had breached their fiduciary duties with respect to each of the 23 loans at issue in this phase of the FDIC’s case against the three individuals. [read post]
7 Apr 2013, 4:00 am by Administrator
Summaries of selected recent cases are provided each week to Slaw by Maritime Law Book. [read post]
2 Aug 2013, 8:00 am by Daniel E. Cummins
The plaintiff asserted a concern that each defendant would try to blame the other for any of the injuries asserted. [read post]
2 Aug 2013, 8:00 am by Daniel E. Cummins
The plaintiff asserted a concern that each defendant would try to blame the other for any of the injuries asserted. [read post]
1 Sep 2011, 2:00 am by Kara OBrien
When a federally insured bank is closed, the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (“FDIC”) is appointed as conservator or receiver. [read post]
25 Feb 2011, 1:02 am by Cynthia Marcotte Stamer
Stamer regularly counsels and helps clients to defend a broad range of clients about employee benefit plan fraud and other fiduciary responsibility concerns. [read post]
5 May 2020, 3:32 am by CMS
The Supreme Court agreed with the Court of Appeal’s finding in respect of issue 2; the nature of the insurers’ claim against the Bank was so closely connected with the question of the insurersliability to indemnify for the loss of the Vessel under the Policy that the subject matter of the claim could be perceived as relating to insurance. [read post]
1 Aug 2012, 8:34 am
 Plaintiffs brought the case in state court, and the defendant (the insurance company) removed it to federal court. [read post]