Search for: "London v. State"
Results 1081 - 1100
of 4,148
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Mar 2023, 3:05 am
Z.o.o. and Ors v Jakubowski and Ors. [read post]
11 Nov 2014, 10:55 pm
”As the Connecticut Supreme Court observed in the 1999 in the definitive case of Babcock v. [read post]
21 Nov 2007, 8:34 am
Investor representatives from Sacramento to London joined forces this week to urge the U.S. [read post]
4 Aug 2024, 10:40 am
UO v London Borough of Redbridge (2024) EWHC 1989 (Admin) We first saw UO and Redbridge in this judicial review of an unlawful housing needs assessment (HNA) and suitability decision. [read post]
2 Jun 2010, 11:46 am
(Ilya Somin) The New York Court of Appeals (which, despite the misleading name, is New York’s state supreme court), held oral arguments yesterday in Kaur v. [read post]
11 Oct 2016, 3:26 am
It was said that To the extent that anything in the Daily Mail’s article was interpreted as stating or suggesting that Mrs. [read post]
29 Aug 2012, 8:43 am
” Commissoner v. [read post]
12 Jan 2009, 6:56 am
United States, No 04-41196 (5th Cir., Oct. 11, 2006). [read post]
16 Jan 2007, 7:03 am
New London, allowing condemnation of private property for redevelopment as a private renewal project. [read post]
13 Dec 2017, 9:36 am
Co. v. [read post]
13 Dec 2017, 9:36 am
Co. v. [read post]
18 Dec 2013, 7:08 am
In the meantime England have managed to retain (yay) and then lose (boo) the Ashes, so it just goes to show that there are worse things in the world than tardy blog writers.The issue in the two cases is neatly stated by Kitchin LJ at [2]:“The central issue on this appeal is whether the decisions in Manek and Desnousse continue to bind this court in the light of the decisions of the Supreme Court in Manchester City Council v Pinnock [2010] UKSC 45, [2011] 2 AC 104 and Hounslow… [read post]
18 Dec 2013, 7:08 am
In the meantime England have managed to retain (yay) and then lose (boo) the Ashes, so it just goes to show that there are worse things in the world than tardy blog writers.The issue in the two cases is neatly stated by Kitchin LJ at [2]:“The central issue on this appeal is whether the decisions in Manek and Desnousse continue to bind this court in the light of the decisions of the Supreme Court in Manchester City Council v Pinnock [2010] UKSC 45, [2011] 2 AC 104 and Hounslow… [read post]
17 Nov 2017, 6:04 am
Norwitz, Sabastian V. [read post]
31 Jul 2022, 6:30 am
As Locke v. [read post]
7 May 2009, 6:42 am
The owners of the Seawheel Rhine were sued both by the owners of the Assi Euro Link and by the Dutch State in the Dutch court of Groningen. [read post]
14 Aug 2017, 4:17 pm
Clause 3.2 stated they they would not publish, in any jurisdiction, any articles or statements which “refer to” Mr Mionis or his “immediate family”. [read post]
30 Nov 2015, 3:34 am
**********PREVIOUSLY, ON NEVER TOO LATENever Too Late 73 [week ending on Sunday 22 November] – Xmas present from Benelux PTO | Eponia never ending troubles | Prof Dr Siegfried Broß v EPO | Protection of formats in the Netherlands | Eponia never ending proceedings | UK intensifies its Cracking Ideas programme | Anne Frank's Diary copyright | Transport for London and IP | CJEU in SBS Belgium v… [read post]
27 Mar 2023, 2:47 am
Z o.o. and others v Jakubowski and others, heard 28th February 2023 Thaler v Comptroller-General of Patents, Designs and Trade Marks, heard 2nd March 2023 The Manchester Ship Canal Company Ltd v United Utilites Water Ltd No 2, heard 6th March 2023 London Borough of Merton Council v Nuffield Health Ltd, heard 7th March 2023 R (on the application of Palmer) v Northern Derbyshire Magistrates Court and another, heard… [read post]
