Search for: "MATTER OF ADOPTION OF A J R" Results 1081 - 1100 of 1,716
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 May 2013, 5:01 pm by oliver randl
More importantly, however, the principle relied on in decision R 21/11, namely that the replacement of members of the BoA should not be ordered without good reason, is not merely a matter of procedural economy. [read post]
15 May 2013, 6:55 am by Joel R. Brandes
Julio J., 20 N.Y.3d 995, 985 N.E.2d 127, 961 N.Y.S.2d 363 (2013) the Court of Appeals observed that before a party can be estopped from denying paternity or from obtaining a DNA test that may establish that he is not the child's biological parent, the court must be convinced that applying equitable estoppel is in the child's best interest (Matter of Shondel J. v Mark D., 7 NY3d 320 [2006]). [read post]
11 May 2013, 1:38 pm
In that case Hinds J.A. adopted the analysis of Master Horn in Lee v. [read post]
30 Apr 2013, 6:36 am
Last Thursday, the Fresno Superior Court (Jeffrey Hamilton, J.) filed his decision adopting his tentative ruling of March 6 as his final ruling with respect to the Motion for Summary Judgment / Summary Adjudication filed by the plaintiff rump diocese and its bishop, Bishop Talton, and joined in by ECUSA itself.The ruling denies ECUSA and its totem plaintiffs any summary judgment, because it finds that there are disputed issues of fact still to be resolved in connection with the… [read post]
22 Apr 2013, 10:36 am by Juan Antunez
In Florida this uncertainty was eliminated in 2007 with the adoption of F.S. 731.401, expressly authorizing mandatory arbitration clauses in wills and trusts (which I wrote about here). [read post]
20 Apr 2013, 2:12 pm by Kirk Jenkins
 We were watching Russell closely here at Appellate Strategist because it was the Court's first opportunity to apply the United States Supreme Court's decision in J. [read post]
15 Apr 2013, 9:01 pm by Joanna L. Grossman
Jarrell, the North Carolina Supreme Court overturned a second-parent adoption, ruling that state law did not permit such adoptions (despite the fact that trial courts had been routinely granting them). [read post]
3 Apr 2013, 9:06 am by Martin George
The Programme Thursday 12th  September 2013 9.00 – 9.30 Registration 9.30 – 10.00 Welcome session (J. [read post]
1 Apr 2013, 9:01 pm by Joanna L. Grossman
A few weeks ago, the Arkansas legislature enacted a law prohibiting all abortions after twelve weeks of pregnancy, a shocking thumb through the teeth to the U.S. [read post]
31 Mar 2013, 5:01 pm by oliver randl
The present decision is an appeal against a decision of the Receiving Section (RS) that there was a loss of rights after the applicant had paid only 80% of the filing fee.The decision is interesting because the Board adopts a somewhat liberal interpretation of R 6. [read post]
20 Mar 2013, 11:49 pm by Florian Mueller
She interned with then-Judge Rader, who is now the Chief Judge of the Federal Circuit.Professor Katherine J. [read post]
25 Jan 2013, 4:09 pm by INFORRM
As the Court points out: “En l’espèce, les photographies litigieuses ont été publiées sur un site Internet appartenant à une société gérée par les deux premiers requérants, dans le but notamment de les vendre ou d’y donner accès contre rémunération. [read post]