Search for: "MATTER OF C A" Results 1081 - 1100 of 36,752
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Feb 2024, 1:01 pm by Josh Blackman
As a threshold matter, this provision expressly contrasts between Senators and Representatives, who are elected, and "any civil Office[s] under the Authority of the United States," which are appointed. [read post]
4 Feb 2024, 7:14 am by Simon Holzer (MLL Legal Ltd.)
From the potpourri of decisions that the Swiss Federal Supreme Court handed down last year, I have selected one in subjective hindsight that I consider to be particularly relevant regarding further cases. [read post]
3 Feb 2024, 4:54 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
Authenticity seems to matter to people even when there’s nothing tangible, like NFTs. [read post]
3 Feb 2024, 2:59 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
” Argument for change to factor 4, that growing a market/market benefits should matter. [read post]
3 Feb 2024, 10:59 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Glynn Lunney: why personalization matters? [read post]
3 Feb 2024, 9:52 am by Marty Lederman
In one of my previous posts, I explained why it's unlikely that a majority of the Justices will hold that the Fourteenth Amendment bars Donald Trump from holding federal office. [read post]
2 Feb 2024, 2:56 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
Potential liability years downstream if that doesn’t matter. [read post]
2 Feb 2024, 11:46 am by Katelynn Minott, CPA & CEO
T note: Canada has two visas that fall under the golden visa category: the Entrepreneur visa (C 11) and the Start-Up Visa (SUV), both of which are more hands-on than traditional golden visas in that they require you to start, own, or operate a business. [read post]
2 Feb 2024, 11:08 am by Rebecca Tushnet
But it’s narrow protection b/c there are no choices. [read post]
2 Feb 2024, 10:32 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
While the district court said that Rupp has no case because he was unaware he was addressing a police officer, "not knowing that the vehicle's driver was a police had no bearing on whether Rupp's shout was speech on a matter of public concern" and therefore protected under the First Amendment. [read post]
1 Feb 2024, 10:46 am by CFM Admin
   Regulation D – the manager will need to determine whether to utilize Section 506(b) or Section 506(c). [read post]
1 Feb 2024, 5:01 am by Eugene Volokh
"As a general matter, the First Amendment prohibits government officials from subjecting individuals to retaliatory actions after the fact for having engaged in protected speech. [read post]
1 Feb 2024, 1:27 am by David Pocklington
This matter has been allocated to the deputy chancellor for decision since prior to filing the petition, the petitioners sought and obtained advice on this matter from the Chancellor [2]. [read post]