Search for: "MATTER OF C B J B"
Results 1081 - 1100
of 3,062
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 May 2023, 12:29 am
Constable J rejected the argument that Groups A and B (representing the Church of England) were designed to represent faith groups while Groups C (representing teachers) and D (representing the local authority) were designed to be secular [65]. [read post]
28 Jan 2011, 1:04 pm
Matthew B. [read post]
14 Feb 2012, 1:35 pm
(j)? [read post]
9 May 2007, 1:34 pm
That test changes the nature of Rule 23(c)(4) dramatically, by making it potentially applicable to any "common issue" no matter how many other individual issues remain.The Draft would thus turn the prevailing view of Rule 23(c)(4) on its head. [read post]
24 Nov 2009, 10:30 am
J. [read post]
19 Apr 2023, 12:42 pm
And whether customary international law survives as a form of federal common law after Erie is a matter of considerable debate among scholars.Compare C. [read post]
30 Mar 2023, 7:10 am
Under this model, providers are responsible for (a) purchasing, (b) submission of claims, and (c) collections of co-insurance/co-payments. [read post]
30 Mar 2023, 7:10 am
Under this model, providers are responsible for (a) purchasing, (b) submission of claims, and (c) collections of co-insurance/co-payments. [read post]
13 Sep 2010, 6:12 pm
The authority to make arrests under paragraph (5)(B) shall only be effective on and after the date on which the Attorney General publishes final regulations which (i) prescribe the categories of officers and employees of the Service who may use force (including deadly force) and the circumstances under which such force may be used, (ii) establish standards with respect to enforcement activities of the Service, (iii) require that any officer or employee of the Service is not authorized to… [read post]
6 Aug 2008, 5:16 pm
J. [read post]
20 Mar 2012, 8:23 pm
Scalia concurring), held that although the Bankruptcy Court had statutory authority to enter judgment on the counterclaim under § 157(b)(2)(C), it lacked constitutional authority to do so. [read post]
19 Oct 2011, 3:30 pm
Director, Frank J. [read post]
10 Jan 2023, 12:08 pm
J. [read post]
15 Aug 2020, 4:29 am
Danielle B., 158 A.D.3d 767, 71 N.Y.S.3d 549 [2d Dept. 2018] and Matter of Christopher YY. v. [read post]
7 Mar 2008, 9:46 am
Susan J. [read post]
24 Apr 2007, 1:24 am
§4 shall apply to accidents and dates of disablement which occur on and after such effective date; b. [read post]
6 Feb 2015, 7:57 am
B. [read post]
12 Jan 2012, 9:42 am
No. 194798/21722 (Panama); RUC # 2172202194798 (Panama) [SDNT] ESCALONA, Victor Julio, c/o C A V J CORPORATION LTDA., Bogota, Colombia; c/o C.A. [read post]
14 Feb 2024, 12:48 pm
Id. at (b) & (c). [read post]
13 Jan 2011, 10:00 pm
The appellants submitted, in respect of Mitting J’s findings on proportionality, (a) that he had been wrong in his conclusion that the Order was “rationally connected” to the legitimate aim (b) that the Order was unduly draconian in the light of the need for minimum interference, and (c) the procedural deficiencies also impact on proportionality (a) Rational Connection and Proportionality This part of the appeal was dismissed. [read post]
