Search for: "MATTER OF RULES ON DISQUALIFICATION" Results 1081 - 1100 of 1,155
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Aug 2013, 6:52 pm by Cynthia Marcotte Stamer
Employer and union group health plan sponsors and insurers of group and individual health plans (Health Plans) agonizing over 2014 plan design decisions are running out of time. [read post]
22 Jun 2011, 7:32 am by velvel
It has also come to be the prevailing view that ‘(m)ost of the law concerning disqualification because of interest applies with equal force to . . . administrative adjudicators. [read post]
29 Oct 2019, 5:59 pm by Lundgren & Johnson, PSC
  The disqualification period for a commercial driver’s license can be as long as the person’s lifetime. [read post]
29 Oct 2019, 5:59 pm by Lundgren & Johnson, PSC
  The disqualification period for a commercial driver’s license can be as long as the person’s lifetime. [read post]
31 Mar 2008, 11:41 pm
Justice Breyer (who was honored at Fenway Park in 2006) shares ownership duties with Alito and likewise removed himself from the case.Their recusal under the ethics law, 28 U.S.C. 455(b)(4) comes because a justice "shall" disqualify himself if he has "a financial interest in the subject matter in controversy ... [read post]
9 Apr 2009, 9:27 am
(Promote the Progress) N D Illinois one step closer to adopting patent rules (Peter Zura's 271 Patent Blog) Innovate Texas Foundation launched to accelerate state’s IP commercialisation (Technology Transfer Tactics) Special Masters a [read post]
24 Sep 2021, 7:27 am
  What adds weight here, though is the intentional nature of the acts--that the unfounded charges were made deliberately to deceive and manipulate the unsuspecting--charges also leveled against the Chinese central authorities by the liberal democratic states in other matters. [read post]
14 Jun 2019, 1:57 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
Duration affirms the specificity of the length b/t author and work as copyright subject matter. [read post]
1 Mar 2024, 11:34 am by Norman L. Eisen
” Once oral argument concludes, the Court is not bound by any rules limiting the time it takes to issue its ruling. [read post]
4 Feb 2020, 9:30 am by Phil Dixon
The Court there found that a disqualification order would be effectively reviewable on direct appeal and therefore failed to meet the requirements of the collateral order doctrine. [read post]
31 Oct 2018, 11:21 am by John Elwood
Circuit’s decision upholding the rules – known to nerds as Munsingwear vacatur. [read post]
22 Jul 2022, 4:00 am by Jim Sedor
They argued the disclosure rules are unconstitutional and burdensome. [read post]
30 Sep 2019, 12:03 am by Cristina Mariottini
The ECRIS additionally aims at ensuring that a person convicted of a sexual offence against children will no longer be able to conceal this conviction or disqualification with a view to performing professional activity related to supervision of children in another Member State (Recital 12 of Council Framework Decision 2009/315/JHA, in conjunction with article 10(3) of Directive 2011/93/EU). [read post]
12 May 2021, 9:01 pm by Neil H. Buchanan
He continues to fail (or refuse) to understand that the Court’s unanimous ruling does not mean that it did not consider the merits. [read post]
17 Mar 2022, 11:17 am by Cynthia Marcotte Stamer
  Noncompliance with these requirements can trigger substantial judgments, civil monetary penalties, program disqualification and exclusion and in some instances criminal or civil prosecution under the False Claims Act and other federal statutes. [read post]
13 Aug 2019, 11:38 am by Patricia Hughes
It is true that the fear expressed by some (I include myself) when these question and answer sessions were instituted, that they would become partisan and place nominees in untenable positions, such as being pressured to announce how they would rule on a particular matter or to explain specific decisions they might have made if they had previously held a judicial appointment, has not occurred. [read post]
4 Feb 2024, 6:29 pm by Marty Lederman
Part II of Donald Trump’s brief argues that the factual predicate for the Colorado Supreme Court’s decision to remove Trump’s name from the primary ballot was absent because Trump did not “engage in” an insurrection against the United States on January 6, 2021.[1]  [Apologies in advance about all the footnotes, but I didn't want to clutter the text with too many peripheral matters.]The Colorado Supreme Court held that Trump’s words on… [read post]
28 Aug 2024, 6:05 am by Edgar Chen
Even those who have had brushes with the law must admit what they’ve done, knowing full well it could lead to delays or disqualification. [read post]
2 Jun 2017, 6:36 am by John Elwood
Now on to the things that really matter. [read post]