Search for: "MYERS v. MYERS" Results 1081 - 1100 of 2,241
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Aug 2017, 4:02 am by Edith Roberts
” In an op-ed at STAT, Michael Burg weighs in on the court’s recent opinion in Bristol-Myers Squibb Co. v. [read post]
11 Feb 2015, 9:52 pm by Patricia Salkin
Myers v Ocean City Zoning Board of Adjustment, 2014 WL 7565888 (1/16/2015) The opinion can be accessed at: http://www.judiciary.state.nj.us/opinions/a2268-13.pdf Filed under: Comprehensive Plan, Current Caselaw [read post]
11 Aug 2015, 8:34 am by Fabrizio di Piazza
” Arguing the line-item veto case as Solicitor General immediately after the Supreme Court announced Clinton v. [read post]
16 Feb 2012, 10:52 am by Erik Lundegaard
Petrocelli, O'Melveny & Myers, Business Litigation: "From O.J. to Skilling" 2010: Marshall B. [read post]
4 Apr 2008, 9:14 am
  Speakers included Tom Myers from the Chamber, Jim Gulliford from EPA, Bill Gulledge from the American Chemistry Council, Sean Murdock from the NanoBusiness Alliance, and Shaun Clancy from Evonik Degussa. [read post]
11 Jan 2019, 11:14 am by Mark Tabakman
The Court stated that “in so holding, we are persuaded by our prior precedent and the Second Circuit’s well-reasoned decision in [Myers v. [read post]
18 Feb 2020, 4:46 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
However, “allegations consisting of bare legal conclusions as well as factual claims flatly contradicted by documentary evidence are not entitled to any such consideration” (Maas v Cornell Univ., 94 NY2d 87, 91 [internal quotation marks omitted]; see Myers v Schneiderman, 30 NY3d 1, 11). [read post]
25 Nov 2012, 1:00 pm
Under  Bristol-Myers Squibb v Paranova condition ("the BMS conditions"), Condition 5 requires the importer to give notice to the trade mark owner before any repackaged product is put on sale, and, on demand, supplies him with a specimen. [read post]
1 Jun 2018, 4:35 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Nor do we believe that our decision will lead to unpredictability or confusion given that it reiterates the proposition that bare legal conclusions in a pleading are not entitled to consideration when assessing a motion to dismiss under CPLR 3211 (a) (7) (see Myers v Schneiderman, 30 NY3d 1, 11 [2017]; Connaughton v Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc., 29 NY3d at 141; Maas v Cornell Univ., 94 NY2d 87, 91 [1999]; Rodriguez v Jacoby & Meyers,… [read post]