Search for: "Marketing Concepts, Inc."
Results 1081 - 1100
of 1,862
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Sep 2013, 1:19 pm
[#Toxics]Waste Information & Management Services, Inc. [read post]
3 Apr 2016, 9:24 am
As the use of the “Maestro SWISS” sign and the marketing plans related thereto were intended to communicate a Swiss connection, such use could not be assumed as having been made in good faith, regardless of whether it started before or after the GIA’s birth. [read post]
11 Feb 2021, 2:42 pm
A veteran of the technology, media, and entertainment industries, Ron has been at the forefront of numerous innovative business concepts - as both an attorney and business leader for startups as well as Fortune 100 companies such as Intel and Toshiba. [read post]
6 Mar 2019, 12:00 am
In any event, the Court found that those elements do not suffice to counterbalance the clear differences existing between the conflicting marks on a conceptual level.In addition, the Court noted that the marks did not share the concept of a ‘fruit with a bite taken out of it’ [So, what you're saying is we can have an apple but we can't take a bite out of it? [read post]
19 Dec 2013, 12:02 pm
Smith & Nephew, Inc., No. 13 C 1850, slip op. [read post]
31 Oct 2011, 7:30 am
The paper further applies this theoretical framework to the conflict between the human right to health and patents on pharmaceuticals, which incentivize the development of drugs by providing pharmaceutical companies with temporary exclusivity to market them. [read post]
29 Apr 2016, 8:56 am
Tropicana Products Inc., No. 09-cv-6130 (C.D. [read post]
18 Jul 2022, 6:02 am
It would seem perverse to award market exclusivity based on a fake-it-until-you-make-it approach. [read post]
18 Feb 2013, 8:29 am
Nike, Inc., 2012 WL 7017821 (N.D. [read post]
11 Oct 2010, 5:56 am
Ct. 3218, 3225 (2010), discussing the subject matters that can be patented, and Ariad Pharms., Inc. v. [read post]
26 Jan 2010, 4:45 am
48/09 P Lego Juris A/S v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market and MEGA Brands, Inc. [read post]
14 May 2019, 8:01 am
Gear Inc v Hi-Tech Sports plc [1992] FSR 121, Morritt J stated "…it seems to me that 'reason to believe' must involve the concept of knowledge of facts from which a reasonable man [person] would arrive at the relevant belief. [read post]
14 Oct 2012, 7:12 am
” These regulations mandate the submission of evidence envisioned in an administrative law case, Matter of Modular Container Systems, Inc., 89-INA-288 (BALCA 1991). [read post]
2 Apr 2012, 4:00 am
Perhaps more familiar are the similar concepts of accomplice or accessory liabilities in criminal law. [read post]
23 Nov 2022, 6:32 am
“It beggars belief,” they write, “that Congress would have delegated to the Commission the authority to set substantive climate policy through entrusting to it the authority to prevent fraud and ensure orderly markets. [read post]
23 Nov 2022, 6:32 am
“It beggars belief,” they write, “that Congress would have delegated to the Commission the authority to set substantive climate policy through entrusting to it the authority to prevent fraud and ensure orderly markets. [read post]
24 Jul 2009, 1:02 am
The result is that Whirlpool is unable to stop a competitor coming into the market with a product that closely resembles its own. [read post]
3 Feb 2011, 4:45 am
Davis Testbed Specializes in Cyber-Crime Profiling – http://tinyurl.com/4btd4b8 (Michael Kassner) XML Carnage - http://tinyurl.com/4o2qrvu (Stephen Arnold) Vendor Views Industry Landscape 80% Year-Over-Year Growth for eDiscovery Service Provider Orange Legal Technologies – http://bit.ly/f0Sav8 (Business Wire) Autonomy Announces 2010 Financial Results – http://tinyurl.com/6ccj7fy (Press Release) Autonomy Extends Market-Leading Social Media Capabilities to eDiscovery -… [read post]
11 Aug 2019, 8:50 am
Despite some recent controversy over how corporations received their legal personhood in America, the origins of this concept goes back much further in history. [read post]
6 Jun 2024, 2:00 pm
As I’ve explained before, HomeAway absolutely requires the affected online marketplaces to monitor third-party content to avoid falsely marketing unavailable options, so the panel’s squib is disconnected from the actual case holding. [read post]
