Search for: "Matter of Dear"
Results 1081 - 1100
of 3,433
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Apr 2016, 4:01 am
“Defendant Wilson professed that he was in charge of the investigation and would be the only person to declare someone a witness in this matter,” according to the lawsuit. [read post]
19 Apr 2016, 5:32 am
The problem, dear Shaun, is that we’re over informed, to the point that it’s no longer news, but just another day. [read post]
14 Apr 2016, 7:23 am
Let’s pretend my dear husband were in the jury pool for a case where I was the defense attorney. [read post]
14 Apr 2016, 4:19 am
No amount of procedural fairness matters if the outcome of guilt is already decided. [read post]
14 Apr 2016, 3:16 am
Dear Aiken Standard: Whether you criticize or not has no bearing on the ardent-ness of your First Amendment protectionism. [read post]
7 Apr 2016, 12:04 pm
March 23, 2016 Dear Mr. [read post]
7 Apr 2016, 9:15 am
Accordingly, I do not reach the First Amendment issue that was also raised in this matter. [read post]
4 Apr 2016, 2:35 pm
The subject line was `dear occifer unger,’ and the body of the e-mail stated: `how is stephanie unger doing? [read post]
22 Mar 2016, 7:02 am
” God smiles, “No matter. [read post]
18 Mar 2016, 9:44 am
Encryption Isn’t Something We Can Negotiate About, No Matter How Politically Convenient That May Seem Dear President Obama, During your keynote conversation at SXSW, you called for a concession on security in our digital devices, stating that you don’t believe in “an absolutist view” when it comes to cryptography on phones. [read post]
17 Mar 2016, 12:43 pm
The OCR interprets (or misinterprets) Title IX to force colleges and universities to hold Star Chamber-like proceedings in matters of campus sexual assault. [read post]
16 Mar 2016, 9:01 pm
No one bothered to respond to his silly suggestion that a written opinion of the United States Supreme Court, interpreting a provision of the federal Constitution, had no more weight than advice in a Dear Abby column.But perhaps the most outrageous of all the moles to pop up in the wake of Obergefell was a ruling by the Alabama Supreme Court that a final judgment of adoption issued by a Georgia court did not need to be given “full faith and credit” by courts in Alabama. [read post]
16 Mar 2016, 12:14 pm
To make matters worse they are understaffed and will not be able to handle the caseload in a timely manner. [read post]
14 Mar 2016, 3:23 am
As readers may know, this has been a topic dear to this very blog's heart and its contributors' mouths for a while now [here]. [read post]
13 Mar 2016, 3:24 am
As readers may know, this has been a topic dear to this very blog's heart and its contributors' mouths for a while now [here]. [read post]
10 Mar 2016, 4:30 am
Don’t be a moron, no matter how good it makes you feel for the moment. [read post]
8 Mar 2016, 7:59 am
(BHP)Dear Larry, I do not know if I'm able to make me understand. [read post]
3 Mar 2016, 4:52 am
There are a number of points of divergence, some of which include:Art 25(a) and (c) UPCA do not explicitly have a territoriality requirement for infringement of a product patent, but s. 60(1)(a) and (c) PA 1977 do“Subject matter” protected under the UPCA is not necessarily the same as “the invention” protected by s. 60. [read post]
26 Feb 2016, 8:48 am
It is worth noting that very few, if any, campus sexual misconduct cases have made it to the federal appeals courts since the Department of Education started stepping up requirements with its Dear Colleague Letter in 2011. [read post]
26 Feb 2016, 8:48 am
It is worth noting that very few, if any, campus sexual misconduct cases have made it to the federal appeals courts since the Department of Education started stepping up requirements with its Dear Colleague Letter in 2011. [read post]
