Search for: "Michigan v. Ohio" Results 1081 - 1100 of 1,355
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Jul 2009, 3:47 am
Louisiana - Court overrules Michigan v. [read post]
21 Jul 2009, 11:33 pm
Circuit Court for the Southern District of Ohio 1861). [read post]
20 Jul 2009, 10:00 pm
Levine" -- slated for publication in the Ohio State Law Journal:"This Article addresses the Supreme Court's recent preemption decision in Wyeth v. [read post]
8 Jul 2009, 1:01 am
See, for instance, the treatment of Geoffrey Feiger (story here just for calling Michigan appeals court justices a series of offensive names and suggesting that they should have anal sex with a toilet plunger) and Mark Gardner (here for writing in a motion for reconsideration that a panel of Ohio appellate judges were result oriented, OK, he said it a lot more offensively than that).I first took on those rules back when I was in law school, pointing out in a letter in the NY Times… [read post]
2 Jul 2009, 9:36 am
On July 1, 2009, the Michigan Supreme Court published an opinion in People v. [read post]
2 Jul 2009, 9:34 am
On July 1, 2009, the Michigan Supreme Court published an opinion in People v. [read post]
22 Jun 2009, 2:08 pm
The sovereignty of Alabama, is less than the sovereign dignity of Michigan. [read post]
18 Jun 2009, 6:27 am
[Alaska, California, Indiana, Minnesota, Ohio, Pennsylvania, Texas and Utah]Kathy Carlson, Wyoming State Law Library director, responded to the survey for Wyoming ([www.aallnet.org]). [read post]
2 Jun 2009, 4:52 am
Back in 1986, the Court had decided in Michigan v. [read post]
1 Jun 2009, 5:00 am
  A 2002 decision by the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals, which covers Michigan, Ohio, Kentucky and Tennessee, agreed with Friedman. [read post]
7 May 2009, 1:09 pm
" When I have Michigan sack the little weasel Ohio State QB eight times in the first half, I'm not simply taking out my frustrations on Ohio State, I'm specifically satisfying my bloodlust for Tyrell Pryor. [read post]
6 May 2009, 3:58 am
The interpretation would all but exclude FMLA coverage in remote areas with limited medical care where doctors and other health care providers, of necessity, still make house calls.Employers should be very cautious with this decision.The Sixth Circuit covers Michigan, Ohio, Kentucky, and Tennessee. [read post]