Search for: "NIXON v. STATE"
Results 1081 - 1100
of 1,199
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Dec 2017, 12:54 pm
But Hemel and Posner also cited the constitutional conflict with the concept that no person is above the law, most famously stated in the Supreme Court’s decision that forced President Richard Nixon to release the Watergate tapes. [read post]
6 Apr 2008, 5:42 pm
., Mitchell v. [read post]
18 Sep 2007, 12:42 pm
A third significant and publicly accessible case involves the constitutionality of a particular federal regulation of child pornography (United States v. [read post]
18 Sep 2023, 5:55 am
” Examining the Harvard Law School’s compendium of Article 51 letters, it is clear that although a number of states had filed Article 51 letters in which they cited both state and non-state actor threats, relatively few states had exclusively cited non-state actor threats in Article 51 letters filed before 2001. [read post]
1 Feb 2015, 9:01 pm
In Train v. [read post]
6 Sep 2012, 3:10 pm
As compared to earlier affirmative action cases, relatively little is really at stake in Fisher v. [read post]
15 Aug 2019, 12:28 pm
In the Nixon years, Mort Halperin and Tony Lake spar with Henry Kissinger over further escalation in Vietnam. [read post]
9 Apr 2010, 1:01 pm
Nixon appointed him to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit, in Chicago, in 1970.Justice Stevens maintained an active life outside the court, and did much of his work from a home in Florida, for years piloting his own plane there and back. [read post]
31 Jan 2021, 9:01 pm
Title X was signed into law in 1970 by (Republican) President Nixon. [read post]
22 Mar 2023, 5:58 am
While there, she gained fame for “saving” Major League Baseball with her strike-ending decision in Silverman v. [read post]
3 Mar 2017, 9:30 am
” And finally, on January 20, 2017, in apparent accordance with Article II, Section I, Clause 8, “Before he enter[ed] on the execution of his office, he [took] the following oath or affirmation:—‘I do solemnly swear . . . that I will faithfully execute the office of President of the United States, and will to the best of my ability, preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States. [read post]
17 Feb 2014, 4:36 am
Issues like federalism and state action doctrine do bear on 1A issues. [read post]
22 Dec 2010, 5:28 am
Consider the case of Nixon v Ross Coates Solicitors that was heard by the EAT earlier this year (and thus predating the Equality Act). [read post]
25 Aug 2008, 10:27 am
State Bd. of Exam'rs. of Pub. [read post]
28 Dec 2011, 11:05 pm
Accordingly, the slight differences in actions and words of Obama v. [read post]
24 Aug 2019, 6:30 am
Citizens, 1919-1924Conveners: Kenneth Mack, Harvard Law School (kmack@law.harvard.edu), Laurie Wood, Florida State University (lmwood@fsu.edu), Jacqueline Briggs, University of Toronto - Centre for Criminology and Sociolegal Studies (jacq.briggs@mail.utoronto.ca), and John Wertheimer, Davidson College (jow [read post]
18 May 2009, 11:29 am
In Van Devent v. [read post]
16 Aug 2023, 7:00 am
(Particularly following the Supreme Court’s 1983 decision in INS v. [read post]
1 Mar 2024, 11:34 am
U.S. v. [read post]
20 May 2024, 8:40 am
By contrast, Paul-Emile’s theory might suggest a revisionist reading of Gonzales v. [read post]
