Search for: "New York Times Co. v. United States" Results 1081 - 1100 of 2,531
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Feb 2023, 6:30 am by John Mikhail
The Constitution of the United States has been called the world’s most important legal document. [read post]
5 Mar 2015, 2:56 pm by John Elwood
The current relist king, the five-time relisted Bower v. [read post]
17 Apr 2015, 8:58 am by WIMS
  National / International News <> Judges Skeptical of Challenge to Proposed EPA Rule on Climate Change - (New York Times) A panel of federal judges appeared inclined on Thursday to dismiss the first legal challenge to President Obama's most far-reaching regulation to slow climate change (Murray Energy v. [read post]
17 Oct 2016, 4:36 am by Edith Roberts
” In The New York Times, Alan Blinder reports on the aftermath of the Supreme Court’s decision last term in Hurst v. [read post]
30 Jan 2019, 6:04 am by Betty Lupinacci
Pittsburg[h] Base Ball Club, by New York: Goodwin & Co., c1887, Library of Congress Prints and Photographs DivisionIf you were not aware, the Library of Congress is the place for baseball cards. [read post]
3 Sep 2013, 3:30 am by Peter Mahler
Internal Revenue Code or minority shareholder rights under New York’s Business Corporation Law although, to be fair, neither of those laws (or country or state for that matter) existed in his time. [read post]
15 Dec 2011, 12:22 am by Kevin LaCroix
 However, last year, in an abrupt reversal, the United States Supreme Court dramatically limited the extraterritorial application of U.S. securities laws in Morrison v. [read post]
1 Apr 2009, 4:15 am
Lawsuit for libel brought against public official turns on whether the statements objected to were uttered with "actual malice"Shulman v Hunderfund, 2009 NY Slip Op 02263, Decided on March 26, 2009, Court of AppealsIn the words of Justice Smith, "In this action for libel by a public figure, the record does not clearly and convincingly show that the statements in question were made with "actual malice," as required by New York Times… [read post]
3 Dec 2018, 10:06 am by Schachtman
Last week, the New York Court of Appeals, New York’s highest court, agreed to state out loud that the plaintiffs’ “every exposure” theory had no clothes, no foundation, and no science. [read post]
21 Apr 2020, 3:59 am by Edith Roberts
” In Atlantic Richfield Co. v. [read post]
8 Jul 2019, 11:31 am by Amy Howe
The justices did not schedule New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. [read post]