Search for: "New York v. Hill"
Results 1081 - 1100
of 1,789
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Mar 2014, 7:28 am
Remember the DC Circuit opinion in Aamer v. [read post]
28 Feb 2014, 1:43 pm
Professor Ruthann Robson, City University of New York (CUNY) School of Law In its opinion in Dariano v. [read post]
27 Feb 2014, 7:53 am
(Citing Arbor Hill Concerned Citizens Neighborhood Ass'n v. [read post]
27 Feb 2014, 6:19 am
I had some serious misgivings about Kagan due to her view that New York Times v. [read post]
27 Feb 2014, 6:19 am
I had some serious misgivings about Kagan due to her view that New York Times v. [read post]
21 Feb 2014, 2:24 pm
Here, defendant shipped at least one dress into New York that allegedly infringes Plaintiffs' Sherri Hill’s copyrights, albeit in response to an order from plaintiffs' attorneys. [read post]
21 Feb 2014, 2:10 pm
When those exemptions were later tested in court by Catholic Charities, which claimed that its religious free exercise rights under those respective state constitutions were being infringed, the New York and California courts handily rejected those claims, applying the doctrinal free exercise framework from Employment Division v. [read post]
14 Feb 2014, 10:29 am
The Court summarized the law on vested rights in New York as follows: " a vested right can be acquired when, pursuant to a legally issued permit, the landowner demonstrates a commitment to the purpose for which the permit was granted by effecting substantial changes and incurring substantial expenses to further the development" (Town of Orangetown v Magee, 88 NY2d 41, 47; see Matter of RC Enters. v Town of Patterson, 42 AD3d 542, 544; Matter of Lefrak… [read post]
14 Feb 2014, 10:29 am
The Court summarized the law on vested rights in New York as follows: " a vested right can be acquired when, pursuant to a legally issued permit, the landowner demonstrates a commitment to the purpose for which the permit was granted by effecting substantial changes and incurring substantial expenses to further the development" (Town of Orangetown v Magee, 88 NY2d 41, 47; see Matter of RC Enters. v Town of Patterson, 42 AD3d 542, 544; Matter of Lefrak Forest… [read post]
12 Feb 2014, 9:25 am
Lamb and The Episcopal Church v. [read post]
7 Feb 2014, 2:14 pm
The New York State courts have departed from the second prong of Strictland, adopting a rule somewhat more favorable to defendants as in People v Turner. [read post]
3 Feb 2014, 3:51 am
Sure enough, when I checked the lower court’s decision (read here), I saw that the LLC in question, a New York based corporate governance/proxy solicitation firm known as Laurel Hill Advisory Group, is a Delaware LLC. [read post]
31 Jan 2014, 11:23 am
See Kash Hill’s coverage here. [read post]
31 Jan 2014, 8:44 am
The following is a series of questions posed by Ronald Collins on the occasion of the publication of The Progeny: Justice William Brennan’s Fight to Save New York Times v. [read post]
28 Jan 2014, 11:04 am
The Journal also reports that Iran nuclear negotiations are set to change venue, to New York City. [read post]
19 Jan 2014, 4:02 pm
Research and Resources “Institutional Actors in New York Times v Sullivan”, Paul Horwitz, Georgia Law Review, Forthcoming. [read post]
19 Jan 2014, 2:16 pm
First, in New York Times v. [read post]
15 Jan 2014, 12:11 am
Department of Justice, the Commodity Futures Trading Commission, the European Commission, the Swiss Financial Market Supervisory Authority, the Hong Kong Monetary Authority, the Monetary Authority of Singapore and regulators in Brussels.[13] Significantly, over a dozen currency traders reportedly have been suspended or put on leave while the inquiries take place at Barclays (6), Citigroup (1), JP Morgan (1), Standard Chartered (1), Royal Bank of Scotland (2) and UBS (1).14] These… [read post]
14 Jan 2014, 8:59 am
”).See New York Times Co., Inc. v. [read post]
14 Jan 2014, 6:50 am
Yesterday the Supreme Court denied cert in Cotterman v. [read post]
