Search for: "North v. State"
Results 1081 - 1100
of 13,328
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Aug 2011, 7:24 pm
Parson v. [read post]
25 Apr 2012, 10:55 am
The Fifth District Court of Appeals in Florida - the appeals court covering the north/central part of the State, recently decided T.M.H. v. [read post]
11 Apr 2016, 7:32 pm
North Dakota), and qualified official immunity in the face of use of excessive force allegations ( Mullenix v. [read post]
2 Jan 2013, 8:38 pm
Par. 58 (quoting Sutton v. [read post]
6 Jul 2010, 1:11 pm
Similar to its federal counterpart, North Dakota Rule of Evidence 615 provides that At the request of a party the court shall order witnesses excluded so that they cannot hear the testimony of other witnesses, and it may make the... [read post]
17 Feb 2011, 11:17 am
Like its federal counterpart, North Carolina Rule of Evidence 609(b) provides that Evidence of a conviction under this rule is not admissible if a period of more than 10 years has elapsed since the date of the conviction or of... [read post]
1 Sep 2009, 7:25 am
State of North Carolina. [read post]
15 Jun 2023, 11:48 am
State v. [read post]
19 Apr 2013, 9:04 am
Said case is controlling in the states of Maryland, North Carolina, South Carolina, Virginia, and West Virginia but can be used as a persuasive authority throughout the United States. [read post]
10 May 2016, 8:17 am
State v. [read post]
10 May 2016, 8:17 am
State v. [read post]
5 Jan 2012, 4:45 pm
Patrick Vance have posted The Scope and Implications of Stern v. [read post]
24 Oct 2022, 2:23 pm
That's the case involving a claim by North Carolina legislators that under the Constitution only the legislature of a state has the power to regulate federal elections--without any interference from state courts or any constraints from state constitutions. [read post]
20 Jul 2010, 4:00 am
A summary of Armstrong v. [read post]
17 May 2010, 3:01 am
Ct. of Appeals Oral Arguments in Kaur v. [read post]
9 Feb 2012, 1:22 pm
Similar to its federal counterpart, North Carolina Rule of Evidence 612 allows an attorney to refresh a witness' recollection through a "writing. [read post]
12 Mar 2014, 4:28 pm
Similar to its federal counterpart, North Dakota Rule of Evidence 804(b)(4) provides an exception to the rule against hearsay for (4) Statement of Personal or Family History. [read post]
11 Dec 2015, 1:54 pm
North Dakota (14-1468); Bernard v. [read post]
29 Mar 2012, 10:51 am
(Eugene Volokh) Bateman v. [read post]
8 Mar 2013, 3:19 pm
Hearings are at the Ronald Reagan State Office Building, 300 South Spring Street, Third Floor, North Tower. [read post]
