Search for: "O. Johnson" Results 1081 - 1100 of 2,595
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Feb 2016, 6:59 am
  That's a rather British word, meaning someone who "inclines to each of two opposite sides as interest dictates," according to the OED, which attributes this usage "to Lord Halifax and those associated with him (1680–90), but by him accepted in the sense ‘one who keeps even the ship of state’; hence ‘one who changes sides to balance parties’ (Johnson). [read post]
11 Feb 2016, 6:52 am by Kevin Johnson
Kevin Johnson is Dean and Mabie-Apallas Professor of Public Interest Law and Chicana/o Studies at UC Davis School of Law. [read post]
11 Feb 2016, 4:02 am by Ed. Microjuris.com Puerto Rico
Mientras la apelación estaba pendiente, el Tribunal Supremo de los Estados Unidos emitió su opinión para el caso Johnson v. [read post]
9 Feb 2016, 9:30 pm by Dan Ernst
Johnson[:]I see NRA Counsel use my name, for basic[.] [read post]
7 Feb 2016, 9:07 am by Ad Law Defense
  ** Third Circuit Affirms That Purported Class Representative Super Bowl Ticket Buyers Do Not Have Standing To Sue For NFL Ticket Practices That “Forced” Them to Buy Scalped Secondary Market Tickets… [read post]
3 Feb 2016, 6:45 am by Jim Sedor
Audit Reopens Questions about Vincent Gray’s 2010 Election Campaign” by Aaron Davis for Washington Post Ethics Pennsylvania: “Former Reading Official Gets 2 Years in Bribery Case” by Jeremy Roebuck for Philadelphia Inquirer Elections “Martin O’Malley to Drop Out After Finish in Iowa Vote” by Ashley Parker for New York Times “Cruz Edges Trump in Iowa Caucuses; Rubio Finishes Strong Third” by Philip Rucker and Jenna Johnson for… [read post]
23 Jan 2016, 10:13 am by MBettman
Chief Justice O’Connor and Justices Pfeifer and O’Donnell dissented, and would have dismissed the case as improvidently allowed. [read post]
14 Jan 2016, 2:14 pm by Native American Rights Fund
Legislation Bulletin http://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/legislation/114_uslegislation.htmlOne bill was added:H.R.4390: Johnson-O'Malley Supplemental Indian Education Program Modernization Act. [read post]
10 Jan 2016, 12:11 pm by Ad Law Defense
** Courts Are Inconsistently Grappling With the Question of Whether a Plaintiff Has Standing for an Injunction Prohibiting Misleading Behavior if They are Aware of the Behavior ** . . . [read post]
10 Jan 2016, 7:49 am by Steve Kalar
The Supremes granted cert. in Welch, and will decide whether its crime of violence decision in Johnson is retroactive (spoiler alert: the government and defense both think it should be). [read post]
6 Jan 2016, 11:35 am
”  Id. at *12 quoting In re Johnson, 558 F.2d 1008, 101[8] (CCPA 1977). [read post]
22 Dec 2015, 1:06 pm by CJLF Staff
Johnson has until Jan. 4 to respond to Goodwin. [read post]
21 Dec 2015, 5:34 pm by Colin O'Keefe
Cyber Defense While Protecting Privacy – New York lawyer Gerald Ferguson of Baker Hostetler on the firm’s Data Privacy Monitor As You Make Your Bed, So You Must Lie In It – Uniondale, NY attorney Lou Vlahos of Farrell Fritz on the firm’s blog, Tax Law for Closey-Held Businesses Steptoe Cyberlaw Podcast – Interview with Mike Daugherty – Washington, DC lawyer Stewart Baker of Steptoe & Johnson on the Steptoe Cyberblog Bernie Sanders:… [read post]
20 Dec 2015, 4:47 am by Dennis Crouch
Licensing Executives Society Daniel Stringfield from Steptoe and Johnson filed the LES brief is interesting because it is somewhat equivocal. [read post]
19 Dec 2015, 8:28 am by MBettman
Johnson& Johnson, 116 Ohio St.3d 468 (2007) (Court rejected a facial challenge to R.C. 2315.18 in which the plaintiff alleged it violated the constitutional guarantees of due process, equal protection, trial by jury,  open courts and right to a remedy.) [read post]
14 Dec 2015, 4:15 pm by Bill Otis
 The idea that there is a privacy interest in what you intentionally post on social media  --  that's  S-O-C-I-A-L  M-E-D-I-A  --  is a thousand miles beyond preposterous.P.P.S. [read post]
6 Dec 2015, 3:05 pm by Steve Kalar
 Hundreds of Ninth Circuit inmates may potentially find their constitutional Johnson claims unfairly precluded by Medina's brief discussion. [read post]