Search for: "P. v. Long"
Results 1081 - 1100
of 7,167
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Jul 2021, 3:18 pm
In Taking Offense v. [read post]
13 Jul 2021, 9:17 am
” (R. v. [read post]
13 Jul 2021, 5:05 am
The Court confronted this directly in Hill v. [read post]
11 Jul 2021, 9:38 am
Pruneyard Shopping Center, 592 P.2d 341, 346 (Cal. 1979) (quoting and describing Schwartz-Torrance Investment Corp. v. [read post]
9 Jul 2021, 4:57 pm
See, e.g., Oliver v. [read post]
9 Jul 2021, 10:41 am
I do think that a platform's recommendations count as the platform's own speech (see p. 71). [read post]
9 Jul 2021, 6:30 am
PCAOB, Seila Law v. [read post]
7 Jul 2021, 9:52 am
P. 10(a)(1) (2021). [read post]
5 Jul 2021, 5:34 am
” Beroth Oil Co. v. [read post]
4 Jul 2021, 4:10 pm
Bruno Lachaux won his long-running claim against the publishers of The Independent, i and the Evening Standard and was awarded a total of £120,000 in damages. [read post]
4 Jul 2021, 8:56 am
The prevalence of Listeria in ready-to-eat meats has not proven difficult to explain. [26, 29] As one expert in another much-cited article has noted: The centralized production of prepared ready-to-eat food products…increases the risk of higher levels of contamination, since it requires that foods be stored for long periods at refrigerated temperatures that favor the growth of Listeria. [read post]
3 Jul 2021, 6:19 am
Bar Assoc. v. [read post]
1 Jul 2021, 1:46 pm
State, 906 P.2d 723 (Nev. 1995) (concluding that violation of bail bond is a continuing offense and reasoning that “[t]o allow [the defendant] to avoid prosecution for [the bail-bond violation] simply because he eluded arrest long enough to surpass the three year statute of limitations is contrary to the purposes of [the violation-of-bail-bond statute] in particular and bail in general. [read post]
1 Jul 2021, 9:04 am
This means that high standards of corporate governance of SOEs are critical to ensure financial stability and sustain global growth.[5] Much excellent academic[6]and policy[7]work continues to at the margins of this area--that is there is a concentration on reform which does not suggest a challenge to the structure on which the current premises of the rules of (and risk allocations to) states engaging in economic activity now rests.[8] Nonetheless, the return of state capitalism,… [read post]
1 Jul 2021, 1:00 am
Data is not available for 2020 and 2021. [11] Section 218 of the Act. [12] Wilkinson v Kitzinger (No 2) [2007] 1 FLR 295, per Sir Mark Potter P at [50]. [13] See paragraph 21(2)(d) of Schedule 5; paragraph 5(2)(d) of Schedule 6; and paragraph 10(3)(a) of Schedule 7. [14] GW v RW (Financial Provision: Departure from Equality) [2003] 2 FLR 108; IX v IY [2018] EWHC 3053 per Williams J at [68]; MB v EB [2019] EWHC 1649. [15] Levin, I. (2004). [read post]
29 Jun 2021, 12:08 pm
In Hudson v. [read post]
29 Jun 2021, 11:41 am
In a 4-3 decision in Hensley v. [read post]
29 Jun 2021, 6:30 am
Lash has produced a single, critical resource for understanding a profound moment in American constitution making—a resource that is long, long overdue. . . . [read post]
28 Jun 2021, 9:45 am
& Health Servs. v. [read post]
