Search for: "PRECISION STANDARD V US"
Results 1081 - 1100
of 4,554
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 May 2020, 5:20 am
These categories arose from categories used for federal anti-discrimination enforcement and affirmative action policies. [read post]
3 May 2020, 6:30 am
Madison, and the Missouri Crisis are told alongside less familiar ones like Martin v. [read post]
1 May 2020, 2:04 pm
North American Olive Oil Ass’n v. [read post]
30 Apr 2020, 12:59 pm
Indeed, the lack of unambiguous clarification of precisely this point was invoked by the German Federal Patent Court as justification for maintaining its referral in the Royalty Pharma case even after the issuance of the CJEU’s judgment in Teva v. [read post]
28 Apr 2020, 2:34 pm
The alternative option would be to conditionally reverse the decision below, but to have the district court decide (now using the correct standard) whether it would have made the same decision that it made about the expert's testimony in the prior trial. [read post]
23 Apr 2020, 8:47 pm
Representative of the Court's treatment of election mechanics is the formulation the Court used in 1974 in Storer v. [read post]
22 Apr 2020, 10:21 am
In Marshall v. [read post]
22 Apr 2020, 3:00 am
Communities for a Better Environment v. [read post]
22 Apr 2020, 2:46 am
One of the fascinating questions raised by the United States Supreme Court's 2018 decision in Carpenter v. [read post]
21 Apr 2020, 4:41 pm
The first is the filing of a lawsuit in federal court by the Governor of Missouri against the People's Republic of China, the Chinese Communist Party and other organs (Missouri v, People's Republic of China). [read post]
17 Apr 2020, 7:13 pm
” And in Veix v. [read post]
15 Apr 2020, 4:12 pm
A couple of decades later, in Jacobson v. [read post]
15 Apr 2020, 2:40 pm
It deploys a medical quarantine authorization to override the protections of the immigration and refugee laws through the use of an unreviewable Border Patrol health “expulsion” mechanism unrelated to any finding of disease or contagion. [read post]
14 Apr 2020, 9:00 pm
Under the standard announced in Casey, a state can regulate pre-viability abortion only as long as it does not impose an undue burden on a woman’s right to terminate a pregnancy. [read post]
13 Apr 2020, 8:40 pm
As as aside, Mark and I discussed the use of the Necessity defense many moons ago in the context of the Casa Express v. [read post]
7 Apr 2020, 10:54 am
For example, in the landmark Carpenter v. [read post]
5 Apr 2020, 10:32 pm
Last week the Munich I Regional Court's press office confirmed to me that the Nokia v. [read post]
3 Apr 2020, 4:10 pm
However, if an employee uses the paid EPSL during this time, the regulations appear to limit the employer’s authority to require the use of accrued leave because it is otherwise considered a paid leave. [read post]
1 Apr 2020, 2:31 am
Reliance on force majeure When considering the impact of a particular event on the ability of a party to perform its obligations, there are a number of matters which the parties will need to consider (noting that the precise application will always turn on the drafting of the provision): Was the party prevented, hindered or delayed (depending on the construction of the clause) from performing the contract because of the relevant event? [read post]
31 Mar 2020, 2:30 pm
V Dean E. [read post]
