Search for: "People v Catchings" Results 1081 - 1100 of 1,855
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Jun 2013, 11:43 am by Jeff Gamso
Which is, of course, nonsense.When the Supreme Court decided Brown v. [read post]
12 Jun 2013, 11:44 pm by Jeff Gamso
 Justice Roberts, with whom I rarely find myself in agreement (and would he stop with that smirky smile, already), got this much exactly right in U.S. v. [read post]
4 Jun 2013, 3:33 pm
  Take for example the recent case of Beattie v Beattie, 2013 SKQB 127 (CanLII), a family law case wherein a BC woman was claiming the need for extended spousal support from her former husband based on her lifestyle. [read post]
15 May 2013, 6:06 am
In that case, the court even commented that "nanny cams" were in fact a proper way to catch people engaged in suspected misdeeds. [read post]
30 Apr 2013, 8:01 am by Attorney Theodore Ronca
This week, a new comp decision came down from the courts (Brown v. [read post]
24 Apr 2013, 7:20 am by Simon Chester
While lawyers and judges are working hard to keep up, it is not very controversial to say that, as a general matter, courts and the legal profession have some work to do to catch up to the current technology movement. [read post]
18 Apr 2013, 5:39 am by Terry Hart
The Second Circuit’s 2008 decision in Cartoon Network v. [read post]
14 Apr 2013, 4:00 am by Administrator
(C.A. of Que., Aug. 15, 2012) (35034) Mar. 7, 13 Maritime Law: Fishing For Crab But Catching Telephone Cables Is the crab fisherman liable in damages to telecoms.Peracomo Inc., et al. v. [read post]
10 Apr 2013, 11:54 am
 Also promoted to the Court of Appeal in the same batch of ten are Sir Geoffrey Vos (remember United Airlines v United Airways, here, Lady Gaga v Moshi Monsters, here?) [read post]