Search for: "People v. Davis"
Results 1081 - 1100
of 2,047
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 May 2023, 4:00 am
But few people ever attempt to convert such decisions into a common currency. [read post]
14 Jan 2022, 12:44 pm
Davis. [read post]
9 Jul 2011, 11:37 pm
Romer v. [read post]
4 Nov 2024, 1:45 am
Newspaper Journalism and regulation GB News has been fined £100,000 by Ofcom for breaching the regulator’s due impartiality rules in relation to its program, People’s Forum: The Prime Minister, in which the then Prime Minister, Rishi Sunak, was allowed to promote his government’s policies and performance “mostly uncontested. [read post]
2 Apr 2023, 11:13 am
Zaman v Waltham Forest LBC Waltham had accepted that it owed Ms Zaman the full housing duty in October 2020. [read post]
22 Jun 2022, 6:47 am
That is a super-timely question--see Whole Women's Health v. [read post]
18 Sep 2014, 5:28 pm
Advertising Week – Lights, Camera, and Action – New York lawyer Ronald Urbach of Davis & Gilbert on his blog, Madison Ave Insights Surviving a Trademark Opposition Challenge: Do You Have a True ‘Intent-to-Use’? [read post]
12 Apr 2019, 12:15 pm
A major problem is that arbitrators are usually industry people who tend to be overwhelmingly older, white and male. [read post]
4 Mar 2011, 12:09 pm
In Eolas v. [read post]
20 Mar 2012, 10:04 am
The less aggressive redistricting plans adopted this cycle show that even strong partisans have absorbed the lesson that if you create a bunch of 53 percent districts you can lose them when your side’s support goes down by 4 or 5 percent.Justice O'Connor said it best in the original political gerrymandering case, Davis v. [read post]
3 Aug 2007, 11:32 am
In Peck v. [read post]
21 Nov 2023, 1:33 pm
Davis, 139 S. [read post]
6 Jul 2007, 4:29 am
We don't know what this stuff means, and unless you're a doctor, chances are that you don't either.But we're pretty sure of one thing - that kind of jargon has very precise medical meaning to the people who do understand what's in these package inserts. [read post]
22 Nov 2017, 11:23 am
" The second segment discusses a Texas death penalty case, Ayestas v. [read post]
6 May 2022, 8:30 am
Nelson v. [read post]
31 Jan 2013, 9:01 pm
What the original draftsmen (that is, the people who actually wrote the words) subjectively intended might be evidence of what the words meant at the time, but any divergence between the drafters’ subjective intentions and the most likely understandings of those words at the time of enactment would be resolved in favor of the latter. [read post]
4 Jan 2013, 7:15 am
Davis L. [read post]
1 Mar 2013, 9:26 am
The Supreme Court was set to hear oral arguments in the case of Shelby County v. [read post]
19 Jun 2016, 7:20 pm
Burlington Admins’ Assoc. v. [read post]
