Search for: "People v. Frank"
Results 1081 - 1100
of 1,677
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 May 2012, 12:56 pm
I used a new blog: McIntyre v. [read post]
23 May 2012, 7:17 am
The Ohio Supreme Court found the state’s process of school funding (using residual general Assembly funds supplemented by local (real property) tax revenues) to be unconstitutional in DeRolph v. [read post]
19 May 2012, 10:53 am
As the federal Second Circuit explained in Joy v. [read post]
14 May 2012, 10:31 pm
It probably only reflects the position as it would have been found to exist at common law (see Vassiliev v Frank Cass & Co Ltd [2003] EWHC 1428 (QB) – in which qualified privilege was found partly on the basis of the journal having an “exclusive readership”). [read post]
14 May 2012, 7:50 am
A recent California appellate court decision (People v. [read post]
14 May 2012, 4:33 am
Journalism and regulation The PCC has ruled on a new case: A Woman v Clevedon People, clauses 3 (privacy) and 14 (confidential sources). [read post]
13 May 2012, 2:02 pm
She considers such cases as Hatton v United Kingdom, Lopez Ostra v. [read post]
7 May 2012, 6:55 am
The case is Baker v. [read post]
2 May 2012, 8:19 am
Have the people available to talk with the SEC examiners. [read post]
1 May 2012, 12:58 pm
Supreme Court, voting 5-4 along ideological lines, has ruled that strip-searches of people arrested for minor offenses does not violate the Fourth Amendment principle against unreasonable searches and seizures. [read post]
27 Apr 2012, 11:34 am
There’s nothing particularly new or ground-breaking about the recent Ontario Superior Court Decision in Sierra Excavating v. [read post]
24 Apr 2012, 1:00 pm
Supreme Court ruled that racism in the application of the death penalty doesn’t matter, we’re finally beginning to have an honest discussion about how we justify legally killing people. [read post]
16 Apr 2012, 10:09 am
[Post by Venkat Balasubramani, with comments from Eric] Mendenhall v. [read post]
5 Apr 2012, 7:44 am
V. [read post]
3 Apr 2012, 5:42 pm
Cooper and Missouri v. [read post]
3 Apr 2012, 5:27 pm
The Court wrote thatEven when viewed in the "totality" of the representation provided defendant, defense counsel's failure to object to any, let alone all, of the prosecutor's egregiously improper departures during summation, particularly in the highly charged, potentially outcome determinative context in which they occurred, deprived defendant of the right to effective assistance of counsel (see People v Baldi, 54 NY2d 137, 146-147 [1981]). [read post]
2 Apr 2012, 4:16 am
There are civil libertarians on both sides of the aisle: Joe Lieberman v. the Internet: It’s not over. [read post]
1 Apr 2012, 8:57 pm
Ted Frank of Point of Law shares similar concern: I am concerned about the report from the McIntyre v. [read post]
31 Mar 2012, 1:48 pm
Weren't these the same Progressives who had run wailing into the cobble-stoned streets sans torches and pitchforks following this Court's rulings in Bush v. [read post]
30 Mar 2012, 11:24 am
Two weeks later - but only a day or two after the first lawsuit was reported - two other guys made basically the same claims in the same court: Daniel Balassone; Benjamin Swartzman, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated v. [read post]
