Search for: "People v. King" Results 1081 - 1100 of 2,871
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Jan 2016, 1:49 pm by John Elwood
” The Court has denied review of petitions by the same counsel challenging the New Jersey ban and a similar California law in King v. [read post]
26 Jan 2016, 4:35 am by INFORRM
 In Brand v Berki [2014] EWHC 2979 (QB), a masseuse was held to have harassed celebrity couple, Russell Brand and Jemima Khan, by accusing them of serious criminal offending in the media, in emails to numerous people, and in an online petition. [read post]
25 Jan 2016, 2:01 pm
Patel: Don't worry like I said only people with the link can view it!! [read post]
25 Jan 2016, 12:55 pm by Eugene Volokh
Thus, for instance, courts have allowed people or their heirs to sue for selling busts of the people (the Martin Luther King Jr. case), prints with charcoal drawings of the people (the Three Stooges case) or cards depicting a person together with a short joke (the Paris Hilton case). [read post]
18 Jan 2016, 4:11 pm by INFORRM
In terms of precedent, her Honour referred chiefly to Leigh v Attorney-General [2010] NZCA 624, [2011] 2 NZLR 148, Phelps v Nationwide News Pty Ltd [2001] NSWSC 130 and Burrows v Knightley (1987) 10 NSWLR 651. [read post]
14 Jan 2016, 11:43 am by John Elwood
Lynch, 15-362, is for all you CAT People out there. [read post]
7 Jan 2016, 8:16 am by Randy Barnett
But one consistently applied rule is particularly germane: The offspring of the King were natural born subjects of the King regardless of where they were born, whether on English territory or not. [read post]
6 Jan 2016, 8:32 pm by Stephen Bilkis
County Court of Kings County, Sup., 129 N.Y.S.2d 109; Matter of Zivin v. [read post]
4 Jan 2016, 1:52 pm by Eugene Volokh
King was the statement, “People always say that I didn’t give up my seat because I was tired, but that isn’t true. [read post]
2 Jan 2016, 2:51 pm by Thaddeus Mason Pope, J.D., Ph.D.
Next week, the 110th AALS Annual Meeting starts in New York. [read post]
28 Dec 2015, 8:49 am by Dave Maass
Second, the claims are ineligible for patent protection under the Supreme Court’s 2014 decision in Alice v. [read post]
28 Dec 2015, 2:51 am by Ben
 Howard E King, The lawyer for Thicke, WIlliams and co-writer rapper TI, said the decision set a "horrible precedent for music and creativity going forward". [read post]