Search for: "People v. London" Results 1081 - 1100 of 1,614
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 Oct 2009, 11:42 pm
The conscious mind, on the other hand, thinks linearly, only able to handle one thought at a time.NOW, think about how the USPTO analyzes whether claims in patent applications are novel and nonobvious, and especially think about the debate on combination inventions presented in KSR v. [read post]
11 Jul 2011, 1:50 am
 Regulation 2(1) of the Business Protection from Misleading Marketing Regulations 2008 has been successfully invoked in a case involving a different scam (the sending out of letters concerning the renewal of non-existent contracts for the repair and maintenance of printers and faxes), London Borough of Croydon v Austin Hogarth [2011] EWHC 1126 (QB), 5 April 2011 (unreported and not available on BAILII -- but the Kat has a copy if you want to see it). [read post]
22 Jan 2010, 2:49 am
If you're in Central London on Thursday 28 January and feel social, a number of members of the IPKat team -- and possibly all five, together for the first time ever -- will be supping a refreshing glass of something other than vodkat at the Melton Mowbray pub, in High Holborn. [read post]
24 Feb 2012, 4:43 am by Anita Davies
Hearing arguments on the Stolen Valor Act, the justices discussed wartime bravery, high school diplomas and lies people tell on dates. [read post]
22 Nov 2010, 2:11 am
 The hosts, the London office of US-based law firm Covington & Burling, are emailing how-to-get-there details to all registrants. [read post]
22 May 2011, 5:33 pm by Ilya Somin
He also believes that Kelo v. [read post]
3 Nov 2010, 5:21 am by charonqc
This is intended to prevent people from hiding their identity where an officer of the rank of inspector or above believes that activities in his area may involve criminal offences. [read post]
9 Mar 2012, 1:00 am
I've given investment advice to so many people over the years, I couldn't possibly remember them all. [read post]
31 May 2012, 7:13 am by Legal Beagle
The second trial of Mr Fraser came after he successfully appealed his conviction to the UK Supreme Court in London last year : Fraser (Appellant) v Her Majesty's Advocate (pdf)The Crown Office released the following statement : Nat Fraser convicted of wife murderNat Fraser was today found guilty of murdering his wife Arlene Fraser in Elgin in April 1998. [read post]
8 Aug 2023, 11:49 pm by Frank Cranmer
In 2007 the Commission opened a statutory inquiry into the London Mill Hill Congregation of Jehovah’s Witnesses (a separately registered charity – 1065638) as a result of the conviction of an elder for the historic abuse of 13 young people over a period of 15 years. [read post]
12 Sep 2023, 2:53 pm by Joanna Powis and Jonathan Lord
Whether all reasonable steps have been taken will be fact-specific and the hurdle is a high one; the Equality and Human Rights Commission (EHRC) stated in its Statutory Code of Practice that “an employer would be considered to have taken all reasonable steps if there were no further steps that they could have been expected to take…” The scope of the defence was recently considered by the employment tribunal (ET) in Fischer v London United Busways Ltd, a gender… [read post]
27 Jan 2017, 1:50 pm by David Graeler
The last time I recall this occurring was in 2005 when the United States Supreme Court held in Kelo v. [read post]
1 Apr 2018, 1:01 am by rhapsodyinbooks
Outstanding people are at the heart of everything we do. [read post]
28 Jul 2022, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
People were persecuted because of their differing conceptions of e.g., the three-part personhood of the Christian deity or because of differing views on transubstantiation. [read post]