Search for: "People v. Price"
Results 1081 - 1100
of 4,383
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Mar 2015, 10:00 am
Insulating companies from competition allows them to raise prices, hurting consumers. [read post]
25 Nov 2019, 6:25 am
As Justice Kennedy wrote in his Davis v. [read post]
10 Jul 2020, 11:35 am
The Court’s ruling yesterday in McGirt v. [read post]
20 Aug 2015, 8:23 am
You’ve likely heard of the famous McDonald’s “hot coffee” case, in which 79-year-old Stella Liebeck – in Liebeck v. [read post]
18 Oct 2024, 3:15 am
In Harper v. [read post]
6 Sep 2012, 7:02 am
Tucker v. [read post]
29 Aug 2008, 12:08 pm
In People v. [read post]
11 Jul 2008, 3:00 pm
Learning about paste special was worth the entire price of the seminar. [read post]
13 Feb 2017, 8:11 am
Boesch v. [read post]
13 Feb 2017, 8:11 am
Boesch v. [read post]
13 Feb 2017, 8:11 am
Boesch v. [read post]
19 Oct 2009, 9:51 am
After 2005’s Cleveland Bar Association v. [read post]
8 Apr 2009, 2:24 pm
Fay v. [read post]
9 Feb 2015, 1:15 am
This post will briefly the issues of ‘drug prices’ and ‘access to medicines’ which received the most comments on previous posts. [read post]
12 Oct 2009, 8:45 am
Lewis v. [read post]
8 Jun 2012, 6:20 pm
Taylor for various acts of misconduct (People v Wildrick, 83 AD3d 1455, 1458, lv denied 17 NY3d 803; People v Morrice, 61 AD3d 1390, 1391-1392; People v Carter, 31 AD3d 1167, 1169), yet the record on this appeal establishes that his misconduct has continued. [read post]
20 May 2014, 4:51 am
“People have paid high prices for that. [read post]
3 Mar 2010, 12:43 am
DISTRICT COURTSOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORKBusiness LawCourt Lacks Jurisdiction Over Suit Arising From Collapse of Fortis' Share Price After BailoutCopeland v. [read post]
23 Sep 2011, 6:09 am
That was the theory of liability in the proposed class action lawsuit Maya et al. v. [read post]
3 Feb 2021, 4:32 pm
” Mr Waymouth had made it clear in his defence that he sought money as a price for removing the review, said Master Cook, adding that he agreed that this conduct wholly undermined the defence of public interest. [read post]
