Search for: "People v. Shields"
Results 1081 - 1100
of 1,980
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Jan 2016, 4:39 am
As said by the Supreme Court of Canada in R. v. [read post]
27 Jan 2016, 4:39 am
As said by the Supreme Court of Canada in R. v. [read post]
26 Jan 2016, 9:53 pm
As such, this may serve you as a sword or a shield depending upon whether you are the party requesting orders or the one opposing them. [read post]
22 Jan 2016, 6:14 am
For example, in Fair Housing Council v. [read post]
5 Jan 2016, 8:34 pm
A New York Family Lawyer said in a case that is one of first impression, this court is confronted with two novel questions: does the attorney confidential privilege survive the death of the client? [read post]
5 Jan 2016, 8:32 pm
Since LISPCC is not a police agency, it cannot represent to the public that it is a police or state agency (Abrams v. [read post]
4 Jan 2016, 1:52 pm
Court of Appeals for the 11th Circuit just handed down an interesting and important right-of-publicity decision, in Rosa & Raymond Parks Institute for Self Development v. [read post]
4 Jan 2016, 6:16 am
As long as the Graham v. [read post]
2 Jan 2016, 12:11 pm
Smith v. [read post]
15 Dec 2015, 11:59 am
The case is Friedrichs v. [read post]
3 Dec 2015, 12:25 pm
Border Agent shoots a Mexican national across the border, and whether qualified immunity can shield an officer based on facts unknown to him at the time of the incident. [read post]
17 Nov 2015, 9:01 pm
” Twenty-five years later, in Grutter v. [read post]
16 Nov 2015, 12:10 am
Readers may remember Case C-283/01 Shield Mark NV v Joos Kist, trading as Memex, in which it was not Rembrandt who provided the cultural content but Ludwig van Beethoven.Merpel has some bad news for Bas and his colleagues, though: she has spotted some killer prior art, below: [read post]
12 Nov 2015, 6:43 pm
The anticompetitive actions always matter to both the market and real people. [read post]
12 Nov 2015, 6:43 pm
The anticompetitive actions always matter to both the market and real people. [read post]
12 Nov 2015, 6:43 pm
The anticompetitive actions always matter to both the market and real people. [read post]
12 Nov 2015, 11:30 am
The petitioner in that case, a firearm-appreciating doctor who is among the tiny handful of people not running for president … yet, challenges a Highland Park, Illinois ordinance banning assault weapons and high-capacity magazines. [read post]
9 Nov 2015, 9:35 am
In the case of Rose v. [read post]
6 Nov 2015, 8:57 am
” For the two people not employed by or named John Elwood who have made it to this point, you’re in luck: There’s more! [read post]
5 Nov 2015, 6:13 am
Sivit v. [read post]
