Search for: "People v. Smith" Results 1081 - 1100 of 3,471
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Jun 2013, 11:43 am by Jeff Gamso
Which is, of course, nonsense.When the Supreme Court decided Brown v. [read post]
14 Aug 2009, 8:46 am
"This allegation would expose Stern to contempt among most people - even if, arguably, not among the social circles in which he and Smith traveled. [read post]
14 Jul 2012, 3:00 am
The nominally private charter or status of the entities in question is not determinative, however (see Smith, 92 NY2d at 713-716; Holden v Board of Trustees of Cornell Univ., 80 AD2d 378, 380-381 [3d Dept 1981]). [read post]
30 Sep 2008, 9:41 pm
  And some people wonder why we have so many fewer actual trials anymore. [read post]
The two Supreme Court cases that comprise the bedrock of legal precedent for the third-party doctrine—Smith v Maryland and United States v Miller—do not apply to cell site location data, the court found: We agree with the defendant…that the nature of cellular telephone technology and CSLI and the character of cellular telephone use in our current society render the third-party doctrine of Miller and Smith inapposite; the digital age has… [read post]
25 Jun 2007, 6:33 am
And today's Supreme Court decision in FEC v. [read post]
30 May 2018, 3:13 pm by Eugene Volokh
From yesterday's Delaware Supreme Court decision in Everett v. [read post]