Search for: "People v. Superior Court"
Results 1081 - 1100
of 3,246
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Apr 2007, 6:05 am
Casey, I find almost nothing to cheer about in the Court's decision last week in Gonzales v. [read post]
17 May 2012, 11:56 am
(People v. [read post]
8 Nov 2011, 6:37 am
(Gillan and Quinton v United Kingdom (2009) The search powers of security personnel at airports were qualitatively different, said the Court. [read post]
24 Mar 2025, 7:23 am
Mack, 362 F.3d 597 (9th Cir. 2004) and People v. [read post]
1 Feb 2014, 6:34 pm
Muller, filed in Suffolk, Mass., Superior Court, KNF&T alleged its former vice president Charlotte Muller violated her non-compete contract in a variety of ways, including her announcement of her new job on LinkedIn. [read post]
18 Jun 2024, 3:38 pm
This issue arose in the Adams v. [read post]
23 Mar 2012, 8:11 am
That is, the Court in Hahn v. [read post]
12 Jun 2019, 3:57 pm
(That was after serving as chief deputy prosecutor for the King County Prosecutor's Office and being a judge of the King County Superior Court. [read post]
11 Feb 2014, 10:02 am
The United States Supreme Court ruled in 1964 in Massiah v. [read post]
11 Feb 2014, 10:02 am
The United States Supreme Court ruled in 1964 in Massiah v. [read post]
26 Jul 2008, 4:49 pm
Masquat v. [read post]
7 May 2015, 3:09 pm
Have a central location -- maybe as part of the superior court's web site -- where all these notices can be made. [read post]
1 Sep 2016, 8:54 am
A very recent appeals court ruling in a case out of the bankruptcy court in Los Angeles, Eden Place v. [read post]
4 Dec 2017, 3:27 pm
Superior Court, ___Cal.App.5th___ [2017 Cal. [read post]
26 Jul 2012, 11:22 am
State v. [read post]
22 Jan 2009, 2:06 am
Specifically as to inadequate warning claims the court in Anderson v. [read post]
General reasonable suspicion of driving without a license just because of knowledge of the defendant
29 Dec 2007, 9:16 am
People v. [read post]
12 Mar 2008, 8:19 am
(See People v. [read post]
6 Feb 2018, 5:10 am
In Folkens v. [read post]
6 Feb 2011, 8:45 pm
His opinion was eventually overruled by the Thirteenth and Fourteenth Amendments.In contrast, Vinson, a district court judge whose opinion will be reviewed by two superior courts, basically argues that the federal government’s power to “regulate interstate commerce” doesn’t include the power to force people to buy and eat broccoli, a position consistent with President Obama’s declared policy (but not constitutional) perspective during… [read post]
