Search for: "Price v Price" Results 1081 - 1100 of 18,228
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Jul 2007, 7:12 am
Last Thursday, however, the First Department reinstated one cause of action under General Business Law § 342-a, which allows for the recovery of civil penalties by the Attorney General (State of New York v Daicel Chem. [read post]
28 Dec 2017, 7:35 am by Daily Record Staff
Real property — Foreclosure auction — Abatement of interest on purchase price On July 23, 2014, John Driscoll, III, and three other individuals, acting as substitute trustees (hereinafter “Substitute Trustees”), appellees, filed in the Circuit Court for Anne Arundel County an Order to Docket Foreclosure/Complaint to Foreclose (hereinafter the “Complaint to Foreclose”) against Kevin Jones, ... [read post]
17 Oct 2016, 7:49 pm by Dennis Crouch
Lower Drug Prices for Consumers (LDPFC) v. [read post]
28 Mar 2011, 12:04 pm
The defendant had failed to establish that a personal attorney-client privilege protected his communications with the attorney.The March 23, 2011, not-for-publication decision in U.S. v. [read post]
18 Aug 2007, 10:16 am
” The court stated that plaintiffs may renew their application if injunctive relief becomes necessary after the expungement proceedings have concluded.The case cite is Price Costco Int’l, Inc. v. [read post]
22 Jun 2012, 2:03 pm
While prices for used cars in Ohio, just like Kentucky, Georgia, and everywhere else, seem to have been higher than normal, industry insiders say the prices should be dropping very soon. [read post]
29 Jan 2018, 4:20 pm
"But, as discussed below, the Unruh Act provides broad protection against arbitrary age-based price discrimination. [read post]
28 Oct 2020, 1:12 pm by Alex Woolgar
He underlined (with reference to Laddie J's judgment in Ocular Sciences v Aspect Vision Care [1997] RPC 289) that breach of confidence claims can be used to oppress and harass competitors and ex-employees. [read post]
19 Jan 2011, 10:46 am by Adam Baker
Naylor Group Inc. v Ellis-Don Construction Ltd., [1996] OJ No 3247, 31 CLR (2d) 195 (ON Gen Div), revd [1999] 119 OAC 182 (ONCA), vard 2001 SCC 58, [2001] 2 SCR 943, online: LexUM http://scc.lexum.org/en/2001/2001scc58/2001scc58.html This is not a tender dispute between an owner and a bidder, but between a general contractor and a subcontractor whose prices were used to secure a low bid. [read post]