Search for: "Price v. Price" Results 1081 - 1100 of 18,261
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Jan 2018, 4:20 pm
"But, as discussed below, the Unruh Act provides broad protection against arbitrary age-based price discrimination. [read post]
19 Jan 2011, 10:46 am by Adam Baker
Naylor Group Inc. v Ellis-Don Construction Ltd., [1996] OJ No 3247, 31 CLR (2d) 195 (ON Gen Div), revd [1999] 119 OAC 182 (ONCA), vard 2001 SCC 58, [2001] 2 SCR 943, online: LexUM http://scc.lexum.org/en/2001/2001scc58/2001scc58.html This is not a tender dispute between an owner and a bidder, but between a general contractor and a subcontractor whose prices were used to secure a low bid. [read post]
14 Mar 2008, 2:33 am
Norris v Government of the United States of America House of Lords “A person could not be extradited to the United States of America to stand trial on charges brought under US legislation which declared cartels to be illegal, to stand trial for price-fixing offences alleged to have been committed from 1989 to 2000 because during that period price-fixing agreements and cartels were not illegal under English law, unless there were other aggravating features such… [read post]
17 Feb 2016, 3:41 pm by The Federalist Society
On January 25, 2016, the Supreme Court decided several energy cases consolidated under the heading Federal Energy Regulatory Commission v. [read post]
22 Jun 2012, 2:03 pm
While prices for used cars in Ohio, just like Kentucky, Georgia, and everywhere else, seem to have been higher than normal, industry insiders say the prices should be dropping very soon. [read post]
18 Aug 2007, 10:16 am
” The court stated that plaintiffs may renew their application if injunctive relief becomes necessary after the expungement proceedings have concluded.The case cite is Price Costco Int’l, Inc. v. [read post]
28 Oct 2020, 1:12 pm by Alex Woolgar
He underlined (with reference to Laddie J's judgment in Ocular Sciences v Aspect Vision Care [1997] RPC 289) that breach of confidence claims can be used to oppress and harass competitors and ex-employees. [read post]
28 Mar 2011, 12:04 pm
The defendant had failed to establish that a personal attorney-client privilege protected his communications with the attorney.The March 23, 2011, not-for-publication decision in U.S. v. [read post]
28 Mar 2011, 7:00 am by Antitrust Today
The United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit has upheld an 18-month prison sentence in U.S. v. [read post]