Search for: "Price v. U.s.*"
Results 1081 - 1100
of 1,813
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Oct 2012, 11:13 am
This has been interpreted to mean attempts at price-fixing are not unlawful unless the other company says “yes. [read post]
30 Sep 2012, 1:41 pm
Corp. v. [read post]
26 Sep 2012, 12:28 pm
But , at what price do we sacrifice our constitutional protections ? [read post]
24 Sep 2012, 7:02 am
In sentencing the brothers, the district court erred in conflating the value of the deer with the full price of a guided hunt. [read post]
17 Sep 2012, 11:05 am
" Employer opposed the motion.Analysis: The USDC for Maryland denied Competitor's motion following the ruling in Aloha Airlines, Inc. v. [read post]
13 Sep 2012, 8:27 am
In the most recent case of LaserDynamics v. [read post]
12 Sep 2012, 9:09 pm
In Oip Techs. v. [read post]
10 Sep 2012, 6:00 am
Price v. [read post]
4 Sep 2012, 8:25 am
SEC v. [read post]
4 Sep 2012, 7:59 am
He appealed, and in United States v. [read post]
31 Aug 2012, 12:29 pm
(Docket No. 12-cv-6625), claiming that Hachette, along with HarperCollins and Simon & Schuster, conspired to "raise the retail price of electronic books" in violation of the Sherman Act [15 U.S.C. sec. 1] and the Clayton Act [15 U.S.C. secs. 12-27]. [read post]
29 Aug 2012, 10:09 pm
According to the Complaint: Wyeth’s scheme included (i) fraudulently procuring three patents for extended release formulations of venlafaxine hydrochloride, (ii) wrongfully listing those patents in the FDA Orange Book as covering Effexor XR, (iii) engaging in serial sham litigation to block and delay multiple generic companies, (iv) entering into a horizontal market allocation and price-fixing agreement with generic manufacturer Teva, and (v) negotiating settlements with… [read post]
29 Aug 2012, 12:35 pm
On June 28, 2012, the United States Supreme Court ruled in National Federation of Independent Business v. [read post]
28 Aug 2012, 3:57 am
See National Federation of Independent Business v. [read post]
24 Aug 2012, 4:23 pm
” Application is defined as the collection of the following six pieces of information: (1) consumer’s name, (2) income, (3) social security number (SSN) to obtain a credit report, (4) property address, (5) an estimate of the value of the property or sales price on a purchase transaction, and (6) the mortgage loan amount sought. [read post]
24 Aug 2012, 6:32 am
’ United States v. [read post]
15 Aug 2012, 12:27 pm
Shields v. [read post]
9 Aug 2012, 2:55 pm
In the New Hampshire case, the court determined that the Ninth Circuit's decision in United States v. [read post]
7 Aug 2012, 6:48 am
Pecover et al v. [read post]
5 Aug 2012, 7:34 am
Pharmaceutical stocks are extremely sensitive to any announcements from foreign regulators as evidenced by the way Ranbaxy’s share prices fluctuated during its face-off with the USFDA. [read post]
