Search for: "Price v. United States" Results 1081 - 1100 of 5,286
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Jan 2015, 7:50 am
That means that §602(a)(1) allows the importation into the United States of a copy of a protected work purchased abroad. [read post]
23 Nov 2011, 5:07 am by Jim Chen
 .In many merger cases, the contribution of antitrust law begins and ends in the United States Department of Justice. [read post]
10 Mar 2016, 5:43 am
-patented article abroad, does not authorize the buyer to import the article and sell and use it in the United States, which are infringing acts absent authority from the patentee. [read post]
24 Apr 2019, 4:04 am by Edith Roberts
United States, which asks when a defendant must have formed the intent required to commit burglary for purposes of a “violent felony” under the Armed Career Criminal Act. [read post]
31 May 2007, 1:15 pm
The price depended on the quantity available and quality. [read post]
9 Jan 2012, 12:00 pm
YSL's attorneys therefore maintained that Louboutin is not entitled to a trademark for the red soles, citing the United States Supreme Court's 1995 decision in Qualitex v. [read post]
5 Mar 2018, 6:54 am by John Jascob
A shareholder class action alleging that the defendants falsely stated that a financial company maintained its principal executive offices in the United States in order to satisfy the criteria for inclusion in the Russell 2000 Index, a small cap stock market index, so as to allow the firm to maintain its listing on the Nasdaq moves on (Desta v. [read post]
The United States District Court for the Southern District of New York (Judge Baer) held that these claims were precluded under Morrison because the plaintiffs’ transactions were the functional equivalent of transactions in VW stock, which was not traded in the United States. [read post]
12 Jan 2024, 9:30 pm by ernst
  Mark Graber disputes the significance of the latest discovery of Josh Blackman and Seth Barrett Tillman related to whether the President is an Office of the United States for purposes of Section 3 of the fourteenth Amendment (Balkinization).ICYMI: The failed attempt to rename Brown v. [read post]
12 Oct 2010, 7:45 am by Nabiha Syed
The Court’s decision in Citizens United v. [read post]
23 Jan 2025, 5:03 am by Kristian Stout
As the DOJ’s complaint quotes an email from a property owner: I also rely on comparing available units to adj[usted] leases needed, to forecast leases, to gut check the pricing recs. [read post]
8 Jan 2014, 1:16 am by Ben Vernia
The case involved a scheme to fix prices on contracts for shipping the household goods of military service members both between the United States and Germany, and within Europe. [read post]
14 May 2021, 6:53 am by Hayleigh Bosher
The Judge stated that the licence would probably have been for a unit price per record and given the nature and reputation of the licensor (with valid rights) and that this was a special anniversary disc which might attract higher pricing, the notional licensee would be able to set a higher price to dealer to maintain profits. [read post]