Search for: "ROSS v. STATE" Results 1081 - 1100 of 1,602
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Dec 2022, 1:14 pm by Scott Bomboy
Ross (21-468) Argued on October 4, 2022 Related Podcast: Pork, The Dormant Commerce Clause, and Legislating Morality In 2018, California voters passed Proposition 12, which banned the sale of pork products in the state—even if the pigs were raised in other states—if the animals were kept in an environment that did not meet state standards of 24 square feet of open space per animal. [read post]
7 Aug 2007, 4:04 am
Evil laugh> from Bill Clinton, Jimmy Carter, Ross Perot, IBM, NASA and the Rockefellers, among others in Tyler v. [read post]
10 Dec 2010, 1:45 pm by WSLL
Domonkos, Cheyenne, Wyoming; George Santini, Ross, Ross & Santini, LLC, Cheyenne, Wyoming.Representing Appellee (Respondent): Bruce A. [read post]
16 Apr 2010, 3:29 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
  In Landau, P.C. v LaRossa, Mitchell & Ross ;2010 NY Slip Op 50620(U) ;Decided on April 7, 2010 ;Supreme Court, New York County ;Schlesinger, J. [read post]
8 Feb 2007, 5:00 pm
(No. 05-0381)With its review of Ross-Simmons Hardwood Lumber Co., Inc. v. [read post]
7 Jun 2016, 6:58 am by Amy Howe
Himmelreich comes from Steven Schwinn for this blog and Jaclyn Belczyk of JURIST, while coverage of the decision in Ross v. [read post]
23 Feb 2022, 1:09 pm by John Elwood
Ross, 21-468Issues: (1) Whether allegations that a state law has dramatic economic effects largely outside of the state and requires pervasive changes to an integrated nationwide industry state a violation of the dormant commerce clause, or whether the extraterritoriality principle described in the Supreme Court’s decisions is now a dead letter; and (2) whether such allegations, concerning a law that is based solely on preferences regarding… [read post]
2 Jun 2018, 10:35 am by Rachel Bercovitz
Grayson Clary discussed the split circuit court opinions on the government’s authority to search electronic devices at the border, focusing on the Eleventh Circuit’s May 23 ruling in United States v. [read post]