Search for: "Richards v. Richards" Results 1081 - 1100 of 12,380
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Dec 2023, 10:00 pm
Partners Jennifer Breen, Richard Zarin, Daniel Carmody, Stephen Tirrell, and Jedd Wider, with associate Scott Lee, co-authored an article for Law360 looking at the US Tax Court’s recent decision in Soroban Capital Partners LP v. [read post]
6 Dec 2023, 10:00 pm
Partners Jennifer Breen, Richard Zarin, Daniel Carmody, Stephen Tirrell, and Jedd Wider, with associate Scott Lee, co-authored an article for Law360 looking at the US Tax Court’s recent decision in Soroban Capital Partners LP v. [read post]
3 Sep 2021, 6:24 am by Dale Burmeister
Amy Croteau, as PR/EO Richard Croteau v Peninsular Fiber Network, LLC et. al., Genesee County Circuit Court, Case No. 20-114514-NO. [read post]
24 Jul 2017, 7:51 am by Steve Lash
Welcome to Monday, the 43rd anniversary of the Supreme Court’s decision in United States v. [read post]
28 Jun 2013, 10:00 am by Paul Caron
Richard Thompson Ainsworth (Boston University) & Boryana Madzharova (University of Erlangen-Nuremberg, Department of Economics), Leveling the International Playing Field with the Marketplace Fairness Act; Quill v. [read post]
6 Nov 2019, 10:25 am by Paul Caron
Rev. 1159 (2019): This paper, written in honor of Judge Richard Posner’s retirement from the federal judiciary, uses his opinion in Exacto Spring v. [read post]
25 Jan 2010, 3:36 am
Termination from Civil Service Law §71 Workers’ Compensation LeaveMatter of Richard Lazzari v Town of Eastchester, 62 AD3d 1002§71 of the Civil Service Law provides for the granting of “workers’ compensation leave” to an employee of the State or a political subdivision of the State who is disabled as the result of a work-connected injury or disease where such injury or disease does not [read post]
10 Sep 2013, 5:51 am by Amy Howe
At USA Today, Richard Wolf reports on efforts to settle Mount Holly v. [read post]
17 Dec 2013, 9:09 pm by David J. Shestokas
On December 16, 2013 US District Court Judge Richard Leon took on arguments[1] that over the years have been used to expand government intrusion into American life in ways that would have left James Madison “aghast”.[2] His opinion in Klayman v. [read post]