Search for: "Robert Sullivan"
Results 1081 - 1100
of 1,279
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Jan 2012, 4:06 pm
Journalism.co.uk has a report by Marianne Bouchart on the significance of a French defamation case, Clearstream v Robert, which ended at the end of last year – after a ten year legal battle. [read post]
27 Jan 2013, 4:06 pm
In the US, Jim Roberts, the assistant managing editor of the New York Times is leaving the paper – and taking the 75,000 people who follow him on Twitter along with him. paidContent assesses the situation here. [read post]
29 Apr 2016, 6:47 am
Sullivan (NJ Advance Media) | Published: 4/22/2016 Howard Birdsall, the former head of one of New Jersey’s most prestigious engineering firms, was sentenced to four years in prison in a “pay-to-play” corruption case that brought about the demise of the company that bore his family’s name. [read post]
12 Jan 2011, 11:36 am
O'Sullivan, David P. [read post]
22 Jan 2016, 6:19 am
The SEC alleged Robert Crowe, a lawyer hired as a fundraiser and lobbyist by State Street, also took part in the kickback scheme. [read post]
27 Oct 2023, 4:04 am
Secretary of State Antony Blinken and national security adviser Jake Sullivan met with China’s top diplomat Wang Yi yesterday. [read post]
22 Apr 2025, 4:18 am
” Emily Peck reports for Axios; Eileen Sullivan reports. [read post]
21 Feb 2019, 9:01 pm
A lobbyist at that firm, Robert Goldberg, also worked on behalf of the strip-club industry. [read post]
12 Mar 2024, 11:01 pm
(Speaking of patents, I'm glad Chief Justice Roberts and Chief Judge Kimberly Moore found something productive to work on together, as Judge Pauline Newman remains trapped in Article III purgatory). [read post]
19 Dec 2007, 9:28 pm
It's certainly no more ridiculous for a 76-year-old philosopher to have blond hair than it is for Robert Plant, at age 59, to be prancing around with a full head of ringlets. [read post]
12 Oct 2010, 7:35 pm
If there was comment on that, and there was, so there was speculation about what Rehnquist's successor, John Roberts, would do. [read post]
10 Oct 2008, 9:00 pm
This Story Doesn’t Cell Daniel Cox and Robert P. [read post]
2 Feb 2012, 4:11 am
(Graphic) bit.ly/zjkvCm (The National Law Journal) Technology and Tactics 5 Common Outlook Errors and How to Fix Them - bit.ly/ykPVVq (Jeff Orloff) 20% of IT Workers Now Using Apple | Computer Business Review - bit.ly/AyrlfH (Allan Swann) Elephants Never Forget - bit.ly/A16VpL (Robert Ambrogi) Email Service, Technology Providers Creating Security Standard - bit.ly/wFc7x2 (ProofPoint) Finders, Keepers: Improve Business by Tailoring Websites to Visitor Needs - bit.ly/zaXZsj (Tam Hebert)… [read post]
5 Oct 2009, 5:45 am
Sullivan, 376 U.S. 254 (1964). [read post]
2 Nov 2011, 6:24 am
Sullivan, 446 U.S. 335, 342-45 (1980). [read post]
9 Aug 2009, 1:21 pm
"Unsurprisingly the news organizations' amici brief focused solely on the dangers of prior restraints and their intersection with copyright injunctions: "indeed, prior restraints cut against the very wording and core of the First Amendment, unlike the much more indirect effect of the First Amendment on libel law"where prior restraints are almost never granted (New York Times Co. v Sullivan (1964)). [read post]
8 Jan 2010, 12:43 am
Schwartzbaum is headed to Greenberg Traurig, Baud to Jones Day, Tristant to Allen & Overy, and Fitzgerald, as name partner, to San Diego litigation boutique Chapin Fitzgerald Sullivan. [read post]
21 Mar 2008, 7:18 am
After a brief opening, Chief Justice Roberts launched into a line of questions he would return to throughout the argument on what he called "the spending clause question. [read post]
21 Sep 2023, 2:19 am
David Goodman, Edgar Sandoval, Miriam Jordan, and Eileen Sullivan report for the New York Times. [read post]
29 Nov 2022, 11:01 am
Lomenzo, decided today by the Second Circuit (Judges Robert Sack, Richard Sullivan, and Eunice Lee): Appellant, proceeding pro se and under the pseudonym "Publius Publicola," appeals from the district court's judgment (1) denying his motion to proceed under a pseudonym and (2) dismissing his claims under 42 U.S.C. [read post]