Search for: "SCALES v. STATE"
Results 1081 - 1100
of 4,887
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Jul 2022, 6:55 am
If necessary, the FTT should perform the appropriate calculations itself or at least state the principles by reference to which the calculation should be made. [read post]
2 Aug 2021, 6:54 am
Facebook, Inc., available at: gov.uscourts.dcd.224921.73.0.pdf (courtlistener.com) & Opinion in State of New York et. al. v. [read post]
25 Nov 2013, 12:30 pm
Abdo points to two concurring opinions in Jones v. [read post]
14 Mar 2023, 5:05 pm
The Grand Chamber builds on its earlier case law, integrating the developments which have occurred since the judgment in Guja v. [read post]
8 Feb 2023, 3:29 pm
Washington State Commercial Passenger Fishing Vessel Association, 443 U.S. 658 (1979) and Washington v. [read post]
5 Aug 2012, 5:00 pm
Schedule V drugs include mostly certain types of cough medicines. [read post]
26 Mar 2015, 10:00 am
Nevertheless, when four Texas parents discovered that the state retained the infant blood spots for future research, they sued (Beleno v. [read post]
6 Mar 2008, 6:23 am
On Tuesday the First Department was confronted by these issues in People v Corliss, 2008 NY Slip Op 01869, which involved a prosecution for an attempted parachute jump off the Empire State Building. [read post]
14 Aug 2009, 1:28 pm
Callaway Golf Co. v. [read post]
12 Mar 2016, 10:29 am
In United States v. [read post]
17 Mar 2015, 4:53 pm
By Pam Devata, John Drury, and Robert Szyba On March 13, 2015, the Solicitor General of the United States filed an amicus brief opposing the petition for writ of certiorari filed in Spokeo, Inc. v. [read post]
6 Jun 2011, 12:35 pm
See Girl Scouts of Manitou Council, Inc. v. [read post]
15 Feb 2018, 3:30 am
” As “premeditated” suggests, the Japanese government views hostile intent (on the part of North Korea in this case) as the most crucial element in determining the occurrence of an armed attack, not the criteria of scale and effect applied by the International Court of Justice (ICJ) in its Nicaragua decision (though scale and effect may serve as evidence of intent). [read post]
29 Jul 2020, 4:19 pm
The facts of Richard v BBC [2018] EWHC 1837 (Ch) help demonstrate this. [read post]
24 Apr 2012, 5:20 am
The orthodox approach is that there is only one civil standard of proof, rather than a higher or lower point on the scale of probabilities, but it can be applied flexibly. [read post]
11 Sep 2013, 4:18 am
Unlike alcohol, which utilizes a blood-alcohol threshold for driving, there is no similar scale for drivers who recently smoked marijuana. [read post]
22 Jul 2020, 6:58 am
The Court of Appeals rules that the search that produced narcotics was illegal.The case is United States v. [read post]
25 Apr 2013, 6:12 pm
Today the Second Circuit Court of Appeals issued a long-awaited decision in favor of fair use in Cariou v. [read post]
20 Jan 2014, 9:26 am
An injunction hearing will be held in San Jose on January 30 over this patent and two other multi-touch software patents.The United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) terminated a reexamination proceeding last year and confirmed several claims, including the one at issue in the California Apple v. [read post]
24 Sep 2019, 1:35 am
However, it states that numerous third States do not recognise the right to dereferencing or have a different approach to that right. [read post]
