Search for: "SPENCER v. SPENCER" Results 1081 - 1100 of 1,276
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Mar 2011, 5:03 pm by rhapsodyinbooks
State-imposed racial segregation was upheld in Plessy v. [read post]
We also expect more disclosure, given the Commission’s endorsement of the principle expressed in the seminal case of TSC Industries, Inc. v. [read post]
8 Feb 2010, 12:30 am
 A1589 Englebright (MS) -- Requires the removal or covering of inapplicable highway work zone traffic control signs No Same asBLURB : V & T L. removal work zone signs Last Act: 02/02/10 REFERRED TO TRANSPORTATIONS2490C KLEIN -- Provides notice to public housing authorities whenever a sex offender is released to public housing No Same asBLURB : Cor. [read post]
20 Feb 2018, 5:50 am by Joy Waltemath
Because the record overwhelmingly confirmed his wrongdoing and that the school district suffered prejudice, a federal court in Pennsylvania precluded him from using the documents, ordered him to return them, and stated that it would determine before trial whether to impose any additional sanctions for his misconduct and false testimony (Spencer v. [read post]
15 Jan 2023, 1:28 am by Frank Cranmer
Leave for prisoners to attend family funerals In Geantă and Others v Romania [2023] ECHR 36 [in French], the Fourth Section held that a refusal to allow prisoners leave to attend the funerals of close family members violated Article 8(1) of the Convention (respect for private and family life). [read post]
3 May 2013, 11:16 am by Ritika Singh
Interestingly, the Volokh Conspiracy notes that the New York Supreme Court held today in Bezio v. [read post]
6 May 2008, 11:28 am
Last week, the Supreme Court issued its decision in Crawford v. [read post]
10 Feb 2008, 8:55 pm
Jaime Spencer ponders the morale boost to criminal defense attorneys given by the NY Giants’ upset of the Patriots. [read post]
12 Jul 2010, 10:44 am
Young & Co), whose team of intellectual property footballing giants was as follows:Goalkeeper: Chris Woods [not could]Defence: Spencer Prior [art],[Problem and] Sol Campbell,Emanuel E-Bo-AMidfield: Emanuel Petit-[ion for review],Lother [Added] Matthaus,FRAND Lampard,OHIM HargreavesStrikers: Karim BenzITMA,Rudi Voller-[tary Divisional Application],Arjen Robben [Jacob]Manager: Giovanni [Art.123(2)/123(3) Trap]-patoniSubstitutes: Miroslav Klose-[st prior art], Gennaro Gat [v. [read post]
21 Mar 2018, 4:26 am by SHG
The Lochner part refers to a 1905 Supreme Court decision, Lochner v. [read post]
3 Aug 2016, 1:21 am by Tessa Shepperson
It isn’t a problem any more though because of the case of Spencer v. [read post]
8 Jul 2014, 9:23 am by John Gregory
The answer to that is generally negative, thanks to the Supreme Court of Canada’s ruling in Crookes v Newton in 2011. [read post]
26 Feb 2024, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
” But Rosen then adds that “Modern originalists are leapfrogging over the Taft era to resurrect an older, anti-Federalist tradition of strict construction and textualism that dates back to Spencer Roane. [read post]