Search for: "STATE v MILLER"
Results 1081 - 1100
of 5,892
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Oct 2019, 9:13 pm
Miller v. [read post]
7 Oct 2019, 5:43 pm
By Ronald Miller, J.D. [read post]
7 Oct 2019, 10:48 am
Vogt of Law 360 reports that the court will be deciding if its earlier rulings in Miller v. [read post]
7 Oct 2019, 9:17 am
Robles, involving whether the accessibility requirements of the Americans with Disabilities Act applies to websites and apps; Miller v. [read post]
6 Oct 2019, 9:53 am
See Final Decree, in Transcript of Re cord, West Virginia State Board of Education v. [read post]
6 Oct 2019, 6:02 am
This means that it was null and of no effect: see, if authority were needed, R (UNISON) v Lord Chancellor [2017] UKSC 51, para 119. [read post]
4 Oct 2019, 9:30 pm
Supreme Court in the current Section 1981 case Comcast v. [read post]
3 Oct 2019, 3:51 pm
” (Citing Kuhn v. [read post]
2 Oct 2019, 10:21 am
Ramos v. [read post]
2 Oct 2019, 9:20 am
State v. [read post]
1 Oct 2019, 6:16 am
STATE V. [read post]
30 Sep 2019, 7:54 pm
Miller v. [read post]
30 Sep 2019, 7:56 am
§ 9003(e)(1)(A); Miller v. [read post]
29 Sep 2019, 2:37 pm
In City of Duluth v. [read post]
29 Sep 2019, 3:15 am
Release date Aug 13 Order a copy in advance. https:/… 2019-09-23 Publishers Say Audible's 'Captions' Defense 'Makes No Sense' – Publishers Weekly https://t.co/LwUCaFwbHF 2019-09-23 OPC concludes consultation on transfers for processing reversing proposal to treat transfers for processing as disc… https://t.co/CKTTM8UiiC 2019-09-23 UKSC rules that the prorogation of Parliament was unlawful R (Miller) v Prime Minister, Cherry & Ors… [read post]
26 Sep 2019, 8:12 am
Simmons (joined by Stevens), rendering minors ineligible for the death sentence, was bolstered by its 2012 ruling in Miller v. [read post]
25 Sep 2019, 4:41 pm
” A v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2005] 1 AC 68, Lord Bingham. [read post]
19 Sep 2019, 10:01 am
The constitutional importance of this point is clear: in R (on the application of Bancoult) v Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs, which was cited by Lord Pannick on behalf of Gina Miller during his oral submissions, Lord Hoffmann held that ‘the unique authority Parliament derives from its representative character’. [read post]
19 Sep 2019, 1:25 am
Notes that the Public Law Project will not be making oral submissions, but says these are important submissions. 1200: Michael Fordham QC says the closest case we have is Bobb & Anor v Manning (Trinidad & Tobago) [2006] UKPC 22 (25 April 2006). 11:55: Michael Fordham QC submits it is accepted prerogative power has to be exercised in the public interest. 11:48: Michael Fordham QC queries whether there is some magic for prerogative powers. [read post]
18 Sep 2019, 1:18 am
It is noted by him that this principle has not been developed to the same degree in Scotland as it may have been south of the border. 1544: Aidan O’Neill QC states that there is no ‘No-deal’ statute. 1542: Lady Hale states that there is always a difficulty faced by the courts as to whether the court should accept the agreement of the parties (referring to the Miller case). [read post]
