Search for: "STATE v PERRY"
Results 1081 - 1100
of 2,364
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Mar 2013, 4:00 am
On Feb. 22, the Justice Department filed a merits brief (full text) in United States v. [read post]
28 Feb 2013, 10:34 pm
On Wednesday, Apple and others filed a brief opposing the Defense of Marriage Act in United States v. [read post]
28 Feb 2013, 10:00 pm
Updated: the Solicitor General has moved for divided argument in Perry. [read post]
28 Feb 2013, 7:01 pm
Perry, the California gay marriage case, asks the Court to adopt the "eight-state solution" to the issue. [read post]
19 Feb 2013, 3:12 pm
State Bank of Cherry v. [read post]
14 Feb 2013, 9:20 am
He filed an amicus brief on Cato’s behalf in Shelby County, as well as a brief in last Term’s redistricting case, Perry v. [read post]
14 Feb 2013, 6:18 am
Perry, the challenge to California’s Proposition 8. [read post]
13 Feb 2013, 9:01 pm
Perry, the plaintiffs challenge California’s voter-adopted ban on same-sex marriage (Proposition 8), and in the other, United States v. [read post]
13 Feb 2013, 1:55 pm
Perry, and twenty-six topside amicus briefs (not including that of the Court-appointed amica) have been filed in the DOMA case, United States v. [read post]
12 Feb 2013, 6:07 am
Just out: Perry A. [read post]
10 Feb 2013, 3:30 am
So, when I was provided a case of Fulgham v. [read post]
5 Feb 2013, 5:07 pm
Perry, docket 12-144). [read post]
4 Feb 2013, 6:18 am
Perry, the challenge to California Proposition 8, and United States v. [read post]
31 Jan 2013, 6:24 am
Perry, the challenge to California’s Proposition 8, while Scottie Thomaston of Equality on Trial covers the National Organization for Marriage’s brief in United States v. [read post]
31 Jan 2013, 4:00 am
Perry and in United States v. [read post]
30 Jan 2013, 1:46 pm
United States, Washington DC Injury Lawyer Blog, November 16, 2012 Supreme Court Rules that Federal Law Preempts State Wrongful Death Lawsuit Over Asbestos Exposure: Kurns v. [read post]
28 Jan 2013, 6:10 am
There’s plenty of buzz over Hollingsworth v. [read post]
24 Jan 2013, 12:13 pm
The three sentence per curiam order (joined by Justices Pariente, Lewis, Quince, Labarga, and Perry) merely stated that the Third District’s decision in Dishkin was in “express and direct conflict” with its decision last year in Sosa v. [read post]
24 Jan 2013, 6:44 am
Perry (the challenge to California’s Proposition 8), and United States v. [read post]
23 Jan 2013, 4:38 am
Perry (Perry v. [read post]
