Search for: "STATE v. HERNANDEZ"
Results 1081 - 1100
of 1,246
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Jan 2009, 3:04 pm
" He also pointed out that although the Court of Appeals had ruled in 2006 in Hernandez v. [read post]
11 Jan 2009, 9:16 am
This order was challenged in the courts on the ground that it was inconsistent with the New York Court of Appeals’ decision in Hernandez v. [read post]
9 Jan 2009, 10:40 am
Hernandez, 45 Cal. 4th 295, 86 Cal. [read post]
6 Jan 2009, 1:41 pm
" Hernandez v. [read post]
28 Dec 2008, 10:43 pm
ELRAC, Inc., 52 AD3d 262 [1st Dept. 2008]); Hernandez v. [read post]
21 Dec 2008, 2:35 pm
Hernandez Middle District of Tennessee at Nashville 08a0765n.06 USA v. [read post]
21 Dec 2008, 2:35 pm
Hernandez Middle District of Tennessee at Nashville 08a0765n.06 USA v. [read post]
17 Dec 2008, 7:16 pm
Guida, No. 05-6105 In death penalty habeas proceedings in a case in which petitioner effectuated a murder-for-hire against her husband, denial of habeas relief is affirmed where: 1) state courts reasonably applied Strickland by concluding that petitioner sabotaged her own defense, as counsel's performance is not deficient when counsel follows a client's instructions; 2) state courts reasonably applied Brady because even if certain letters were favorable evidence, and were… [read post]
17 Dec 2008, 11:54 am
Hernandez, 2008 Cal. [read post]
9 Dec 2008, 7:16 pm
Some academic critics of Roe v. [read post]
4 Dec 2008, 9:34 am
Moreover, while the Court of Appeals - the State's highest court - held in Hernandez v. [read post]
1 Dec 2008, 11:45 am
State v. [read post]
18 Nov 2008, 10:46 am
In State v. [read post]
10 Nov 2008, 7:00 pm
" (Hernandez v. [read post]
7 Nov 2008, 12:30 am
United States v. [read post]
31 Oct 2008, 12:58 am
Washington, 466 U.S. 668 (1984) and adopted by Texas in Hernandez v. [read post]
26 Oct 2008, 6:23 am
As the court in Casey v. [read post]
26 Oct 2008, 5:34 am
United States v. [read post]
20 Oct 2008, 6:46 pm
Supreme Court, October 14, 2008 Moore v. [read post]
15 Oct 2008, 11:32 am
[There was no underlying opinion on this case.]Maria Del Carmen Hernandez v. [read post]