Search for: "Shorts v. Superior Court"
Results 1081 - 1100
of 1,668
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Oct 2013, 1:52 pm
You can read the decision in full here; it's a long one, so even the short summary below isn't exactly short. [read post]
14 Oct 2014, 8:33 am
The Court of Appeal in City of San Jose v. [read post]
23 Nov 2010, 1:21 pm
At the Superior Court level, Plunkard v. [read post]
23 Nov 2010, 1:21 pm
At the Superior Court level, Plunkard v. [read post]
19 Dec 2013, 6:43 pm
If the prosecutor is presenting on short notice, do your notice by email and fax, with an explanation included that you cannot send the letter by U.S. mail because of the short notice you received. [read post]
15 Aug 2010, 10:59 am
The court went on to express serious doubts about the superiority requirement -- in particular noting how unmanageable plaintiff's class definition was. [read post]
23 Oct 2020, 4:29 am
In Kidd v. [read post]
12 May 2010, 10:21 am
Ahmed & Ors v Murphy [2010] EWHC 453 (Admin) This was an appeal to the High Court of a decision by the London Rent Assessment Committee (LRAC) that the maximum fair rent payable by Mr Murphy for the flat in Brick Lane, Spitalfields was £8.50 per week. [read post]
12 May 2010, 10:21 am
Ahmed & Ors v Murphy [2010] EWHC 453 (Admin) This was an appeal to the High Court of a decision by the London Rent Assessment Committee (LRAC) that the maximum fair rent payable by Mr Murphy for the flat in Brick Lane, Spitalfields was £8.50 per week. [read post]
10 Jan 2011, 11:00 am
Proper Purpose Another issue that the Court clarified in Cain v. [read post]
7 Feb 2008, 7:33 pm
The doctrine on this is a bit complicated, but I think it is fair to say that the four leading Supreme Court cases --- Raley v. [read post]
5 May 2015, 1:26 pm
This bill undoes the district court notice and demand procedures enacted by the General Assembly following the Supreme Court’s opinion in Melendez-Diaz v. [read post]
17 Nov 2010, 8:47 pm
Superior Court (Cal. 1990)] (holding that statutory limitation was tolled from the time insured gave notice of loss until coverage was denied). [read post]
20 Jan 2023, 7:55 am
The Supreme Court decision in McCleskey v. [read post]
30 Nov 2019, 8:55 am
"That quote is also interesting with a view to the recently-filed Intel and Apple v. [read post]
9 May 2017, 9:22 am
We’ll have to wait and see if the superior court and the federal court agree. [read post]
9 May 2017, 9:22 am
We’ll have to wait and see if the superior court and the federal court agree. [read post]
21 Oct 2020, 7:28 am
Electric Light Co v. [read post]
12 Mar 2015, 7:40 pm
To say so would mean that Smathers held that the subject was superior to the sovereign in enforcing a claim against an estate. [read post]
2 Mar 2015, 6:48 pm
To say so would mean that Smathers held that the subject was superior to the sovereign in enforcing a claim against an estate. [read post]