Search for: "Smith v. Director" Results 1081 - 1100 of 1,407
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Jun 2013, 7:00 am by Raffaela Wakeman
Steve sang ’Happy Birthday’ to Boumediene v. [read post]
28 Nov 2008, 12:14 pm
– Tackling music piracy in Africa (Afro-IP)   Australia Patent infringement and account of profits: Black & Decker Inc v GMCA Pty Ltd (No 5) (IP Down Under) MONSTER ENERGY keeps battling: Hansen Beverage Company v Bickfords (Australia) Pty Ltd (Australian Trade Marks Law Blog) High Court provides guidance on contributory infringement provision: Northern Territory v Collins (International Law Office)  PricewaterhouseCooper report… [read post]
15 Apr 2013, 7:56 am by INFORRM
Neil Turner v Daily Mail, Clause 1, 12/04/2013; Ms Carina Trimingham v Daily Mirror, Clause 1, 11/04/2013; Ms Carina Trimingham v Metro, Clause 1, 11/04/2013; Bath & North East Somerset Council v The Times, Clause 5, 11/04/2013; Warren Hamilton Daily Mai, Clause 1, 11/04/2013; Catherine Whiteside The Scottish Sun, Clauses 1, 5, 11/04/2013; Ms Lynne Hales v Daily Mail, Clause 6, 11/04/2013; Emilie Sandy v The Citizen (Gloucester) v… [read post]
12 Dec 2022, 7:23 am by INFORRM
Former BBC director general Tony Hall has said it is “simply untrue” that the BBC interview in which Harry and Meghan announced their engagement in 2017 was “rehearsed”. [read post]
5 Jul 2010, 6:31 am
– FCA orders jail time for contempt of court on basis of disobedience of earlier injunctions: Deckers Outdoor Corporation Inc. v Farley (No 8) (Patentology) (IPKat) FCA: Copyright in medical records: Primary Health Care Ltd v Commissioner of Taxation (IP Whiteboard) Are those real? [read post]
18 Sep 2008, 8:56 pm
Dudas Issue: Whether the director of the Patent and Trademark Office lacked constitutional authority to appoint members of the Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences, and, if so, whether the board’s decision below must be vacated as a result. [read post]
22 Mar 2019, 1:05 am by Tessa Shepperson
The Policy Director David Smith said Protecting the rights of landlords to repossess properties in legitimate circumstances is key to providing the confidence the sector needs to offer longer tenancies. [read post]